Inbred corn line lk1

ABSTRACT

Inbred corn lines, designated BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, are disclosed. The invention relates to the seeds of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, to the plants and plant parts of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and to methods for producing a corn plant, either inbred or hybrid, by crossing inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with itself or another corn line. The invention also relates to products produced from the seeds, plants, or parts thereof, of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and/or of the hybrids produced using the inbred as a parent. The invention further relates to methods for producing a corn plant containing in its genetic material one or more transgenes and to the transgenic plants produced by that method and to methods for producing other inbred corn lines derived from inbred corn lines. BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS

The present application claims priority to, and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/954,741, filed on Mar. 18, 2014, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to new and distinctive corn inbred lines (Zea mays, also known as maize), designated BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The disclosures, including the claims, figures and/or drawings, of each and every patent, patent application, and publication cited herein are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

The following description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed inventions, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.

There are numerous steps in the development of any novel, desirable plant germplasm. Plant breeding begins with the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals, and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet the program goals. The goal is to combine in a single variety or hybrid an improved combination of desirable traits from the parental germplasm. These important traits may include higher yield, resistance to diseases and insects, better stalks and roots, tolerance to drought and heat, reduction of grain moisture at harvest as well as better agronomic quality. With mechanical harvesting of many crops, uniformity of plant characteristics such as germination and stand establishment, growth rate, maturity and plant and ear height is important.

Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and the type of cultivar used commercially (e.g., F₁ hybrid cultivar, pureline cultivar, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigree selection, mass selection, recurrent selection, and backcross breeding.

The complexity of inheritance influences choice of breeding method. Backcross breeding is used to transfer one or a few favorable genes for a heritable trait into a desirable cultivar. This approach has been used extensively for breeding disease-resistant cultivars; nevertheless, it is also suitable for the adjustment and selection of morphological characters, color characteristics and simply inherited quantitative characters such as earliness, plant height or seed size and shape. Various recurrent selection techniques are used to improve quantitatively inherited traits controlled by numerous genes. The use of recurrent selection in self-pollinating crops depends on the ease of pollination, the frequency of successful hybrids from each pollination, and the number of hybrid offspring from each successful cross.

Each breeding program should include a periodic, objective evaluation of the efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria vary depending on the goal and objectives, but should include gain from selection per year based on comparisons to an appropriate standard, overall value of the advanced breeding lines, and number of successful cultivars produced per unit of input (e.g., per year, per dollar expended, etc.).

Promising advanced breeding lines are thoroughly tested per se and in hybrid combination and compared to appropriate standards in environments representative of the commercial target area(s) for three or more years. The best lines are candidates for use as parents in new commercial cultivars; those still deficient in a few traits may be used as parents to produce new populations for further selection.

These processes, which lead to the final step of marketing and distribution, usually take from eight to twelve years from the time the first cross is made. Therefore, development of new cultivars is a time-consuming process that requires precise forward planning, efficient use of resources, and a focus on clear objectives.

A most difficult task is the identification of individuals that are genetically superior, because for most traits the true genotypic value is masked by other confounding plant traits or environmental factors. One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performance relative to other experimental plants and to a widely grown standard cultivar. If a single observation is inconclusive, replicated observations provide a better estimate of its genetic worth.

The goal of corn breeding is to develop new, unique and superior corn inbred lines and hybrids. The breeder initially selects and crosses two or more parental lines, followed by repeated self pollination or selfing and selection, producing many new genetic combinations. Another method used to develop new, unique and superior corn inbred lines and hybrids occurs when the breeder selects and crosses two or more parental lines, followed by haploid induction and chromosome doubling that results in the development of dihaploid inbred lines. The breeder can theoretically generate billions of different genetic combinations via crossing, selfing and mutations and the same is true for the utilization of the dihaploid breeding method.

Each year, the plant breeder selects the germplasm to advance to the next generation. This germplasm is grown under unique and different geographical, climatic and soil conditions, and further selections are then made, during and at the end of the growing season. The inbred lines which are developed are unpredictable. This unpredictability is because the breeder's selection occurs in unique environments, with no control at the DNA level (using conventional breeding procedures or dihaploid breeding procedures), and with millions of different possible genetic combinations being generated. A breeder of ordinary skill in the art cannot predict the final resulting lines he develops, except possibly in a very gross and general fashion. This unpredictability results in the expenditure of large research funds to develop several superior new corn inbred lines.

The development of commercial corn hybrids requires the development of homozygous inbred lines, the crossing of these lines, and the evaluation of the crosses. Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are used to develop inbred lines from breeding populations. Breeding programs combine desirable traits from two or more inbred lines or various broad-based sources into breeding pools from which inbred lines are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes or through the dihaploid breeding method followed by the selection of desired phenotypes. The new inbreds are crossed with other inbred lines and the hybrids from these crosses are evaluated to determine which have commercial potential.

Pedigree breeding is used commonly for the improvement of self-pollinating crops or inbred lines of cross-pollinating crops. Two parents which possess favorable, complementary traits are crossed to produce an F₁. An F₂ population is produced by selfing one or several F₁s or by intercrossing two F₁s (sib mating). Selection of the best individuals is usually begun in the F₂ population; then, beginning in the F₃, the best individuals in the best families are selected. Replicated testing of families, or hybrid combinations involving individuals of these families, often follows in the F₄ generation to improve the effectiveness of selection for traits with low heritability. At an advanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F₆ and F₇), the best lines or mixtures of phenotypically similar lines are tested for potential release as new cultivars. Similarly, the development of new inbred lines through the dihaploid system requires the selection of the best inbreds followed by four to five years of testing in hybrid combinations in replicated plots.

Mass and recurrent selections can be used to improve populations of either self- or cross-pollinating crops. A genetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is either identified or created by intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles of selection are continued.

Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for a simply inherited, highly heritable trait into a desirable cultivar or inbred line which is the recurrent parent. The source of the trait to be transferred is called the donor parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent. After the initial cross, individuals possessing the phenotype of the donor parent are selected and repeatedly crossed (backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent.

Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one of several reference books (e.g., R. W. Allard, 1960, Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley and Son; Briggs, F. N. and Knowles, P. F. 1967. Introduction to Plant Breeding. Reinhold Publishing Corporation; N. W Simmonds, 1979, Principles of Crop Improvement, Longman Group Limited; W. R. Fehr, 1987, Principles of Crop Development, Macmillan Publishing Co.; N. F. Jensen, 1988, Plant Breeding Methodology, John Wiley & Sons).

Proper testing should detect any major faults and establish the level of superiority or improvement over current cultivars. In addition to showing superior performance, there must be a demand for a new cultivar that is compatible with industry standards or which creates a new market. The introduction of a new cultivar will incur additional costs to the seed producer, the grower, processor and consumer for special advertising and marketing, altered seed and commercial production practices, and new product utilization. The testing preceding release of a new cultivar should take into consideration research and development costs as well as technical superiority of the final cultivar. For seed-propagated cultivars, it must be feasible to produce seed easily and economically.

Once the inbreds that give the best hybrid performance have been identified, the hybrid seed can be reproduced indefinitely as long as the homogeneity of the inbred parent is maintained. A single-cross hybrid is produced when two inbred lines are crossed to produce the F₁ progeny. A double-cross hybrid is produced from four inbred lines crossed in pairs (A×B and C×D) and then the two F₁ hybrids are crossed again (A×B)×(C×D). Much of the hybrid vigor exhibited by F₁ hybrids is lost in the next generation (F₂). Consequently, seed from hybrid varieties is not used for planting stock.

Hybrid corn seed is typically produced by a male sterility system or by incorporating manual or mechanical detasseling. Alternate strips of two corn inbreds are planted in a field, and the pollen-bearing tassels are removed from one of the inbreds (female). Providing that there is sufficient isolation from sources of foreign corn pollen, the ears of the detasseled inbred will be fertilized only from the other inbred (male), and the resulting seed is therefore hybrid and will form hybrid plants.

The laborious, and occasionally unreliable, detasseling process can be avoided by using cytoplasmic male-sterile (CMS) inbreds. Plants of a CMS inbred are male sterile as a result of factors resulting from the cytoplasmic, as opposed to the nuclear, genome. Thus, this characteristic is inherited exclusively through the female parent in corn plants, since only the female provides cytoplasm to the fertilized seed. CMS plants are fertilized with pollen from another inbred that is not male-sterile. Pollen from the second inbred may or may not contribute genes that make the hybrid plants male-fertile. Seed from detasseled fertile corn and CMS produced seed of the same hybrid can be blended to insure that adequate pollen loads are available for fertilization when the hybrid plants are grown.

There are several methods of conferring genetic male sterility available, such as multiple mutant genes at separate locations within the genome that confer male sterility, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,654,465 and 4,727,219 to Brar et al. These and all patents referred to are incorporated by reference. In addition to these methods, Albertsen et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,068, have developed a system of nuclear male sterility which includes: identifying a gene which is critical to male fertility, silencing this native gene which is critical to male fertility; removing the native promoter from the essential male fertility gene and replacing it with an inducible promoter; inserting this genetically engineered gene back into the plant; and thus creating a plant that is male sterile because the inducible promoter is not “on” resulting in the male fertility gene not being transcribed. Fertility is restored by inducing, or turning “on,” the promoter, which in turn allows the gene that confers male fertility to be transcribed.

There are many other methods of conferring genetic male sterility in the art, each with its own benefits and drawbacks. These methods use a variety of approaches such as delivering into the plant a gene encoding a cytotoxic substance associated with a male tissue specific promoter or an anti-sense system in which a gene critical to fertility is identified and an antisense to that gene is inserted in the plant (see, Fabinjanski, et al. EPO 89/0301053.8 publication number 329,308 and PCT application PCT/CA90/00037 published as WO 90/08828).

Another version useful in controlling male sterility makes use of gametocides. Gametocides are not a genetic system, but rather a topical application of chemicals. These chemicals affect cells that are critical to male fertility. The application of these chemicals affects fertility in the plants only for the growing season in which the gametocide is applied (see Carlson, G. R., U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,904). Application of the gametocide, timing of the application, and genotype often limit the usefulness of the approach.

Corn is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of plant breeders is to develop stable, high yielding corn hybrids that are agronomically sound. The reasons for this goal are obviously to maximize the amount of ears or kernels produced on the land used and to supply food for both humans and animals. To accomplish this goal, the corn breeder must select and develop corn plants that have the traits that result in superior parental lines for producing hybrids.

The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The following embodiments and aspects thereof are described in conjunction with systems, tools and methods which are meant to be exemplary and illustrative, not limiting in scope. In various embodiments, one or more of the above-described problems have been reduced or eliminated, while other embodiments are directed to other improvements.

According to the invention, there are provided inbred corn lines designated BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. This invention thus relates to the seeds of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, to the plants or parts thereof of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, to plants or parts thereof having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and to plants or parts thereof having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 listed in Table 1, including but not limited to as determined at the 5% significance level when grown in the same environmental conditions.

The invention also relates to variants, mutants and trivial modifications of the seed or plant of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. Parts of the inbred corn plant of the present invention are also provided, such as e.g., pollen obtained from an inbred plant and an ovule of the inbred plant. Variants, mutants and trivial modifications of the seed or plant of the corn line of the present invention can be generated by methods available to one skilled in the art, including but not limited to, mutagenesis (e.g., chemical mutagenesis, radiation mutagenesis, transposon mutagenesis, insertional mutagenesis, signature tagged mutagenesis, site-directed mutagenesis, and natural mutagenesis), knock-outs/knock-ins, antisense and RNA interference. For more information of mutagenesis in plants, such as agents, protocols, see Acquaah et al. (Principles of plant genetics and breeding, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007, ISBN 1405136464, 9781405136464, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entity).

The invention also relates to a mutagenized population of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, and methods of using such populations. In some embodiments, the mutagenized population can be used in screening for new corn lines which comprises one or more or all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. In some embodiments, the new corn lines obtained from the screening process comprise all of the morphological and physiological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, and one or more additional or different morphological and physiological characteristics that the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 does not have.

The mutagenized population of the present invention can be used in Targeting Induced Local Lesions in Genomes (TILLING) screening method, which combines a standard and efficient technique of mutagenesis with a chemical mutagen (e.g., Ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)) with a sensitive DNA screening-technique that identifies single base mutations (also called point mutations) in a target gene. Detailed description on methods and compositions on TILLING® can be found in Till et al. (Discovery of induced point mutations in maize genes by TILLING, BMC Plant Biology 2004, 4:12), Weil et al., (TILLING in Grass Species, Plant Physiology January 2009 vol. 149 no. 1 158-164), Comai, L. and S. Henikoff (“TILLING: practical single-nucleotide mutation discovery.” Plant J 45(4): 684-94), McCallum et al., (Nature Biotechnology, 18: 455-457, 2000), McCallum et al., (Plant Physiology, 123: 439-442, 2000), Colbert et al., (Plant Physiol. 126(2): 480-484, 2001), U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,075, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0053236A1, and International Patent Application Publication Nos. WO 2005/055704 and WO 2005/048692, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference for all purposes.

The plants and seeds of the present invention include those that may be of an essentially derived variety as defined in section 41(3) of the Plant Variety Protection Act, i.e., a variety that:

-   -   1. is predominantly derived from inbred corn lines BB208, BB209,         BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5,         LK1, and MM65, or from a variety that is predominantly derived         from inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147,         CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, while         retaining the expression of the essential characteristics that         result from the genotype or combination of genotypes of inbred         corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34,         CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65;     -   2. is clearly distinguishable from inbred corn line BB208,         BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17,         IM5, LK1, and MM65; and     -   3. except for differences that result from the act of         derivation, conforms to the initial variety in the expression of         the essential characteristics that result from the genotype or         combination of genotypes of the initial variety.

In another aspect, the present invention provides regenerable cells for use in tissue culture of inbred corn plant corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the foregoing inbred corn plant. Preferably, the cells of such tissue cultures will be embryos, ovules, meristematic cells, seeds, callus, pollen, leaves, anthers, roots, root tips, silk, flowers, kernels, ears, cobs, husks, stalks or the like. Protoplasts produced from such tissue culture are also included in the present invention. The corn shoots, roots and whole plants regenerated from the tissue cultures are also part of the invention.

Also included in this invention are methods for producing a corn plant produced by crossing the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with itself or another corn line. When crossed with itself, i.e., crossed with another inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plant or self-pollinated, the inbred line corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 will be conserved (e.g., as an inbred). When crossed with another, different corn line, an F₁ hybrid seed is produced. F₁ hybrid seeds and plants produced by growing said hybrid seeds are included in the present invention. A method for producing an F₁ hybrid corn seed comprising crossing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 corn plant with a different corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed are also part of the invention. The hybrid corn seed produced by the method comprising crossing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 corn plant with a different corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed are included in the invention, as are included the hybrid corn plant or parts thereof, seeds included, produced by growing said hybrid corn seed.

In another embodiment, this invention relates to a method for producing the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 from a collection of seeds, the collection containing both inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seeds and hybrid seeds having inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as a parental line. Such a collection of seeds might be a commercial bag of seeds. Said method comprises planting the collection of seeds. When planted, the collection of seeds will produce inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plants from inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seeds and hybrid plants from hybrid seeds. The plants having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of corn inbred BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 or having a decreased vigor compared to the other plants grown from the collection of seeds are identified as inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 parent plant. Said decreased vigor is due to the inbreeding depression effect and can be identified for example by a less vigorous appearance for vegetative and/or reproductive characteristics including shorter plant height, small ear size, ear and kernel shape, ear color or other characteristics. As previously mentioned, if the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 is self-pollinated, the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 will be preserved, therefore, the next step is controlling pollination of the inbred parent plants in a manner which preserves the homozygosity of said inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 parent plant and the final step is to harvest the resultant seed.

This invention also relates to methods for producing other inbred corn lines derived from inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and to the inbred corn lines derived by the use of those methods.

In another aspect, the present invention provides transformed inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210,BB211,BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 or parts thereof that have been transformed so that its genetic material contains one or more transgenes, preferably operably linked to one or more regulatory elements. Also, the invention provides methods for producing a corn plant containing in its genetic material one or more transgenes, preferably operably linked to one or more regulatory elements, by crossing transformed inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with either a second plant of another corn line, or a non-transformed corn plant of the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, so that the genetic material of the progeny that results from the cross contains the transgene(s), preferably operably linked to one or more regulatory elements. The invention also provides methods for producing a corn plant that contains in its genetic material one or more transgene(s), wherein the method comprises crossing the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with a second plant of another corn line which contains one or more transgene(s) operably linked to one or more regulatory element(s) so that the genetic material of the progeny that results from the cross contains the transgene(s) operably linked to one or more regulatory element(s). Transgenic corn plants, or parts thereof produced by the method are in the scope of the present invention.

More specifically, the invention comprises methods for producing corn plants or seeds with at least one trait selected from the group consisting of male sterile, male fertile, herbicide resistant, insect resistant, disease resistant, water stress tolerant corn plants or seeds, or corn plants or seeds with modified, in particular decreased, phytate content, with modified waxy and/or amylose starch content, with modified protein content, with modified oil content or profile, with increased digestibility or with increased nutritional quality. Said methods comprise transforming the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 corn plant with nucleic acid molecules that confer, for example, male sterility, male fertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, or that can modify the phytate, the waxy and/or amylose starches, the protein or the oil contents, the digestibility or the nutritional qualities, respectively. The transformed corn plants or seeds obtained from the provided methods, including, for example, those corn plants or seeds with male sterility, male fertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, modified phytate, waxy and/or amylose starches, protein or oil contents, increased digestibility and increased nutritional quality are included in the present invention. Plants may display one or more of the above listed traits. For the present invention and the skilled artisan, disease is understood to be fungal disease, viral disease, bacterial disease or other plant pathogenic diseases and disease resistant plant encompasses plants resistant to fungal, viral, bacterial and other plant pathogens.

Also included in the invention are methods for producing a corn plant or seed containing in its genetic material one or more transgenes involved with fatty acid metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and starch content such as waxy starch or increased amylose starch. The transgenic corn plants or seeds produced by these methods are also part of the invention.

In another aspect, the present invention provides for methods of introducing one or more desired trait(s) into the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and plants or seeds obtained from such methods. The desired trait(s) may be, but not exclusively, a single gene, preferably a dominant but also a recessive allele. Preferably, the transferred gene or genes will confer such traits as male sterility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, male fertility, water stress tolerance, enhanced nutritional quality, modified waxy content, modified amylose content, modified protein content, modified oil content, enhanced plant quality, enhanced digestibility and industrial usage. The gene or genes may be naturally occurring maize gene(s) or transgene(s) introduced through genetic engineering techniques. The method for introducing the desired trait(s) is preferably a backcrossing process making use of a series of backcrosses to the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 during which the desired trait(s) is maintained by selection.

When using a transgene, the trait is generally not incorporated into each newly developed line such as inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 by direct transformation. Rather, the more typical method used by breeders of ordinary skill in the art to incorporate the transgene is to take a line already carrying the transgene and to use such line as a donor line to transfer the transgene into the newly developed line. The same would apply for a naturally occurring trait (e.g., a native trait, such as but not limited to drought tolerance or improved nitrogen utilization) or one arising from spontaneous or induced mutations. The backcross breeding process comprises the following steps: (a) crossing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plants with plants of another line that comprise the desired trait(s), (b) selecting the F₁ progeny plants that have the desired trait(s); (c) crossing the selected F₁ progeny plants with the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plants to produce backcross progeny plants; (d) selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the desired trait(s) and physiological and morphological characteristics of corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 to produce selected backcross progeny plants; and (e) repeating steps (c) and (d) one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine or more times in succession to produce selected, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise the desired trait(s) and all the physiological and morphological characteristics of corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as listed in Table 1A to 1S, including but not limited to at a 5% significance level when grown in the same environmental conditions. The corn plants or seeds produced by the methods are also part of the invention. Backcrossing breeding methods, well known to one skilled in the art of plant breeding will be further developed in subsequent parts of the specification.

In another aspect of the invention, inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 may be used as a parent, or a single gene conversion or a transgenic inbred corn line of BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, such as BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, MM65, and MN3/MON89034 may be used as a parent and may be crossed with another corn line. Preferably, the single gene conversions or transgenic inbred lines will confer such traits, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, male fertility, water stress tolerance, enhanced nutritional quality, modified waxy content, modified amylose content, modified protein content, modified oil content, enhanced plant quality, enhanced digestibility and industrial usage. The gene or genes may be naturally occurring maize gene(s) (e.g., native traits) or transgene(s) introduced through genetic engineering techniques. The hybrid corn plants or seeds having inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 or a single gene conversion or a transgenic inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as a parental line and having another, different, corn line as a second parental line as discussed above are comprised in the present invention.

Any DNA sequence(s), whether from a different species or from the same species that is inserted into the genome using transformation is referred to herein collectively as “transgenes.” In some embodiments of the invention, a transformed variant of BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 may contain at least one transgene but could contain at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 transgenes. In another embodiment of the invention, a transformed variant of another corn line used as the other parental line may contain at least one transgene but could contain at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or 10 transgenes, such as LH287, MON810, and MON89034.

In an embodiment of this invention is a method of making a backcross conversion of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, comprising the steps of crossing a plant of corn inbred BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with a donor plant comprising a mutant gene or transgene conferring a desired trait, selecting an F₁ progeny plant comprising the mutant gene or transgene conferring the desired trait, and backcrossing the selected F₁ progeny plant to a plant of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. This method may further comprise the step of obtaining a molecular marker profile of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 and using the molecular marker profile to select for a progeny plant with the desired trait and the molecular marker profile of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. In the same manner, this method may be used to produce an F₁ hybrid seed by adding a final step of crossing the desired trait conversion of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with a different corn plant to make F₁ hybrid corn seed comprising a mutant gene or transgene conferring the desired trait.

In some embodiments of the invention, the number of loci that may be backcrossed into inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 is at least 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. A single locus may contain several transgenes, such as a transgene for disease resistance that, in the same expression vector, also contains a transgene for herbicide resistance. The gene for herbicide resistance may be used as a selectable marker and/or as a phenotypic trait. A single locus conversion of site specific integration system allows for the integration of multiple genes at the converted locus.

In a preferred embodiment, the present invention provides methods for increasing and producing inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seed, whether by crossing a first inbred parent corn plant with a second inbred parent corn plant and harvesting the resultant corn seed, wherein both said first and second inbred corn plant are the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 or by planting an inbred corn seed of the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, growing an inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plant from said seed, controlling a self pollination of the plant where the pollen produced by the grown inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plant pollinates the ovules produced by the very same inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 grown plant and harvesting the resultant seed.

The invention further provides methods for developing corn plants in a corn plant breeding program using plant breeding techniques including recurrent selection, backcrossing, pedigree breeding, molecular marker (Isozyme Electrophoresis, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms (RFLPs), Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), Arbitrarily Primed Polymerase Chain Reaction (AP-PCR), DNA Amplification Fingerprinting (DAF), Sequence Characterized Amplified Regions (SCARs). Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphisms (AFLPs), and Simple Sequence Repeats (SSRs) which are also referred to as Microsatellites, etc.) enhanced selection, genetic marker enhanced selection and transformation. Corn seeds, plants, and parts thereof produced by such breeding methods are also part of the invention.

In addition, any and all products made using the corn seeds, plants and parts thereof obtained from inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 or from any corn line produced using inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as a direct or indirect parent are also part of the invention. Examples of such corn products include but are not limited to corn meal, corn flour, corn starch, corn syrup, corn sweetener and corn oil. The origin of the corn used in such corn products can be determined by tracking the source of the corn used to make the products and/or by using protein (isozyme, ELISA, etc.) and/or DNA (RFLP, PCR, SSR, SNP, EST, etc.) testing.

In addition to the exemplary aspects and embodiments described above, further aspects and embodiments will become apparent by study of the following descriptions.

Definitions

In the description and tables which follow, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are provided:

Allele. The allele is any of one or more alternative forms of a gene, all of which relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.

Backcrossing. Backcrossing is a process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny back to one of the parents, for example, a first generation hybrid F₁ with one of the parental genotype of the F₁ hybrid.

BT1-1, BT1. BT1-1 refers to MON810, also known as MON810Bt or BT1, is the designation given by the Monsanto Company (St. Louis, Mo.) for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis and certain other Lepidopteran larvae.

Collection of seeds. In the context of the present invention a collection of seeds will be a grouping of seeds mainly containing similar kind of seeds, for example hybrid seeds having the inbred line of the invention as a parental line, but that may also contain, mixed together with this first kind of seeds, a second, different kind of seeds, of one of the inbred parent lines, for example the inbred line of the present invention. A commercial bag of hybrid seeds having the inbred line of the invention as a parental line and containing also the inbred line seeds of the invention would be, for example such a collection of seeds.

CL. CL, also known as Clearfield is commercial denomination given to the gene that, when present in maize, allows the use of imidazolinone herbicides as a weed control agent for both grasses (i.e., monocotyledons) and broadleaves (i.e., dicotyledons).

Daily heat unit value. The daily heat unit value (also referred to as growing degree unit, or GDU) is calculated as follows: (the maximum daily temperature+the minimum daily temperature)/2 minus 50. All temperatures are in degrees Fahrenheit. The maximum temperature threshold is 86 degrees, if temperatures exceed this, 86 is used. The minimum temperature threshold is 50 degrees, if temperatures go below this, 50 is used. For each hybrid, it takes a certain number of GDUs to reach various stages of plant development. GDUs are a way of measuring plant maturity. GDUs can also relate to stages of growth for an inbred line.

Decreased vigor. A plant having a decreased vigor in the present invention is a plant that, compared to other plants has a less vigorous appearance for vegetative and/or reproductive characteristics including shorter plant height, small ear size, ear and kernel shape, ear color or other characteristics.

Dropped ears. This is a measure of the number of dropped ears per plot, and represents the percentage of plants that dropped an ear prior to harvest.

Dry down. This is the rate at which a hybrid will reach acceptable harvest moisture.

Ear height. The ear height is a measure from the ground to the upper ear node attachment, and is measured in centimeters.

Essentially all of the physiological and morphological characteristics. A plant having essentially all of the physiological and morphological characteristics means a plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics of the recurrent parent, except for the characteristics derived from the converted gene.

GDU pollen. The number of heat units from planting until 50% of the plants in the hybrid are shedding pollen.

GDU silk. The GDU silk (=heat unit silk) is the number of growing degree units (GDU) or heat units required for an inbred line or hybrid to reach silk emergence from the time of planting.

Harvest aspect. This is a visual rating given the day of harvest or the previous day. Hybrids are rated 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with poorer scores given for poor plant health, visible signs of fungal infection, poor plant intactness characterized by missing leaves, tassels, or other vegetative parts, or a combination of these traits.

Herbicide resistant or tolerant. A plant containing any herbicide-resistant gene or any DNA molecule or construct (or replicate thereof) which is not naturally occurring in the plant which results in increase tolerance to any herbicide including, imidazoline, sulfonylurea, glyphosate, glufosinate, L-phosphinothricin, triazine and benzonitrile. For purposes of this definition, a DNA molecule or construct shall be considered to be naturally occurring if it exists in a plant at a high enough frequency to provide herbicide resistance without further selection and/or if it has not been produced as a result of tissue culture selection, mutagenesis, genetic engineering using recombinant DNA techniques or other in vitro or in vivo modification to the plant.

Inbreeding depression. The inbreeding depression is the loss of performance of the inbreds due to the effect of inbreeding, i.e., due to the mating of relatives or to self-pollination. It increases the homozygous recessive alleles leading to plants which are weaker and smaller and having other less desirable traits.

Late plant greenness. Similar to a stay green rating. This is a visual assessment given at around the dent stage but typically a few weeks before harvest to characterize the degree of greenness left in the leaves. Plants are rated from 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with poorer scores given for plants that have more non-green leaf tissue typically due to early senescence or from disease.

MN RM. This represents the Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating (MN RM) for the hybrid and is based on the harvest moisture of the grain relative to a standard set of checks of previously determined MN RM rating. Regression analysis is used to compute this rating.

Moisture. The moisture is the actual percentage moisture of the grain at harvest.

Plant cell. Plant cell, as used herein includes plant cells whether isolated, in tissue culture, or incorporated in a plant or plant part.

Plant habit. This is a visual assessment assigned during the late vegetative to early reproductive stages to characterize the plant's leaf habit. It ranges from decumbent with leaves growing horizontally from the stalk to a very upright leaf habit, with leaves growing near vertically from the stalk.

Plant height. This is a measure of the height of the hybrid from the ground to the tip of the tassel, and is measured in centimeters.

Plant intactness. This is a visual assessment assigned to a hybrid or inbred at or close to harvest to indicate the degree that the plant has suffered disintegration through the growing season. Plants are rated from 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with poorer scores given for plants that have more of their leaf blades missing.

Plant part. As used herein, the term “plant part” includes any part of the plant including but not limited to leaves, stems, roots, seeds, grains, embryos, pollens, ovules, flowers, ears, cobs, husks, stalks, root tips, anthers, silk, tissue, cells and the like.

Pollen shed. This is a visual rating assigned at flowering to describe the abundance of pollen produced by the anthers. Inbreds are rated 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with the best scores for inbreds with tassels that shed more pollen during anthesis.

Post-anthesis root lodging. This is a percentage plants that root lodge after anthesis: plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30° angle or greater.

Pre-anthesis brittle snapping. This is a percentage of “snapped” plants following severe winds prior to anthesis.

Pre-anthesis root lodging. This is a percentage plants that root lodge prior to anthesis: plants that lean from the vertical axis at an approximately 30° angle or greater.

Predicted RM. This trait for a hybrid, predicted relative maturity (RM), is based on the harvest moisture of the grain. The relative maturity rating is based on a known set of checks and utilizes conventional maturity such as the Comparative Relative Maturity Rating System or its similar, the Minnesota Relative Maturity Rating System.

Quantitative trait loci (QTL). Quantitative trait loci refer to genetic loci that control to some degree numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed.

RBDHV, CCR1, CRW2-1. RBDHV, CCR1 or CRW2-1 refers to MON88017, also known as MON88017CCR1, is the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent. In addition, this event produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the corn root worm, Diabrotica virgifera, and certain other Coleopteran larvae.

Regeneration. Regeneration refers to the development of a plant from tissue culture.

RMQKZ, RMQKC, RMQKD. RMQKZ, RMQKC, or RMQKD refers to a combination of Mon88017 (see below) and Mon89034 transgenes for insect resistance and gyphosate tolerance. Mon89034 is a transgenic event expressed in maize, that produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis and certain other Lepidopteran larvae.

RHTTZ, RR2. RHTZZ and RR2 refers to MON603, also known as MON603RR2, better known as NK603, is the designation for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent on the crop. Another transgenic event, GA21, when expressed in maize, also allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent on the crop.

Root lodging. The root lodging is the percentage of plants that root lodge; i.e., those that lean from the vertical axis at an approximate 30° angle or greater would be counted as root lodged.

Seed quality. This is a visual rating assigned to the kernels of the inbred. Kernels are rated 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with poorer scores given for kernels that are very soft and shriveled with splitting of the pericarp visible and better scores for fully formed kernels.

Seedling vigor. This is the vegetative growth after emergence at the seedling stage, approximately five leaves.

Silking ability. This is a visual assessment given during flowering. Plants are rated on the amount and timing of silk production. Plants are rated from 1 (poorest) to 9 (best) with poorer scores given for plants that produce very little silks that are delayed past pollen shed.

Single gene converted. Single gene converted or conversion plants refers to plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein essentially all the morphological and physiological characteristics of an inbred are recovered in addition to the single gene transferred into the inbred via the backcrossing technique or via genetic engineering. This also includes multiple transference of single genes.

Stalk lodging. This is the percentage of plants that stalk lodge, i.e., stalk breakage, as measured by either natural lodging or pushing the stalks and determining the percentage of plants that break off below the ear. This is a relative rating of a hybrid to other hybrids for standability.

Standability. A term referring to the how well a plant remains upright towards the end of the growing season. Plants with excessive stalk breakage and/or root lodging would be considered to have poor standability.

Stay green. Stay green is the measure of plant health near the time of black layer formation (physiological maturity). A high score indicates better late-season plant health.

Transgenic. Where an inbred line has been converted to contain one or more transgenes by single gene conversion or by direct transformation.

Variety. A plant variety as used by one skilled in the art of plant breeding means a plant grouping within a single botanical taxon of the lowest known rank which can be defined by the expression of the characteristics resulting from a given genotype or combination of phenotypes, distinguished from any other plant grouping by the expression of at least one of the said characteristics and considered as a unit with regard to its suitability for being propagated unchanged (International Convention for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants).

Yield (Bushels/Acre). The yield is the actual yield of the grain at harvest adjusted to 15.5% moisture.

ZKDDZ. ZKDDZ refers to MON810, also known as MON810Bt or BT1, is the designation given by the Monsanto Company (St. Louis, Mo.) for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis and certain other Lepidopteran larvae.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 is a corn inbred with superior characteristics, and provide very good parental lines in crosses for producing first generation (F₁) hybrid corn. Inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 is best adapted to the East, Central, South and Western regions of the United States Corn Belt in the zones that are commonly referred to as Zones 5, 6 and 7. Hybrids that are adapted to these maturity zones can be grown on a significant number of acres as it relates to the total of the USA corn acres.

BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 is an inbred corn line with high yield potential in hybrids. Hybrids with inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as one parental line produce uniform, consistent sized ears with a high kernel row number and heavy, hard-textured kernels. Often these hybrid combinations result in plants which are appreciably better than average for stalk strength, grain yield, and test weight when compared to inbred lines of similar maturity and geographical adaptability. Some of the criteria used to select ears in various generations include: yield, yield to harvest moisture ratio, stalk quality, root quality, disease tolerance with emphasis on grey leaf spot, test weight, late season plant greenness, late season plant intactness, ear retention, ear height, pollen shedding ability, silking ability, and corn borer tolerance. During the development and selection of the line, crosses were made to inbred testers for the purpose of estimating the line's general and specific combining ability, and evaluations were run by the Ames, Iowa Research Station. The inbred was evaluated further as a line and in numerous crosses by the Ames station and other research stations across the Corn Belt. The inbred has proven to have an excellent combining ability in hybrid combinations.

Inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 has shown uniformity and stability for the traits, within the limits of environmental influence for the traits. These lines have been increased with continued observation for uniformity of plant type. inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 has the following morphologic and other characteristics (based primarily on data collected at Ames, Iowa, unless otherwise specified).

BB208

TABLE 1A VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BB208 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Ames, IA 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants 1562 GDD in silk: (Growing Degree Days) From planting to 50% of plants 1507 GDD in pollen: Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 197.5 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 57.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 14.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.6 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Strongly present Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 6.7 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 82.2 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6.5 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 58° 5. Leaf color: Greenish yellow, Munsell 7.5GY 4/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 2 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 7 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 5.4 2. Branch angle from central spike: 57° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 38.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 4 5. Anther color: Yellow, Munsell 10Y 7/10 6. Glume color: Greenish yellow, Munsell 2.5 GY 7/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Greenish yellow, Munsell 2.5 GY 8.5/6 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Greenish yellow, Munsell 5GY 7/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Yellow, Munsell 5Y 9/2 4. Position of ear: n/a 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): n/a 6. Husk extension at harvest: 2.2 cm Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 10.1 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 3.7 cm 3. Ear weight: 47.8 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14 5. Row alignment: Slightly crooked 6. Ear taper: Slight Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 10.5 mm 2. Kernel width: 7.0 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 5.0 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Yellowish red, Munsell 10YR 7/10 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 25.3 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 21.4 mm 2. Cob color: Red, Munsell 10R 6/6 Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): N/A %

BB209

TABLE 1B VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BB209 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Champaign, IL 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants 1511 in silk: From planting to 50% of plants 1511 in pollen: Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 200.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 55.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 13.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0.0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.5 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 9.0 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 84.0 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 30° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 3-5GY3/2 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 3 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 3 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 8.0 2. Branch angle from central spike: 20° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 47.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 8 5. Anther color: Munsell 3-10RP7/6 6. Glume color: Munsell 2-5GY6/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 1-10Y9/8 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5GY8/10 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5Y9/2 4. Position of ear: Upright 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 2 6. Husk extension at harvest: 2 (Medium, up to 8 cm) Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 15.0 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 4.3 cm 3. Ear weight: 146.0 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14-16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.0 mm 2. Kernel width: 7.0 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.0 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 1-10YR8/10 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 31.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 22.0 mm 2. Cob color: Dark Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0%

BB210

TABLE 1C VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BB210 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Champaign, IL 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants 1488 GDD in silk: From planting to 50% of plants 1511 GDD in pollen: Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 215.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 60.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 15.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0.0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.9 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 8.0 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 88.0 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 20° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 3-5GY3/2 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 4 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 9.0 2. Branch angle from central spike: 70° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 49.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 7 5. Anther color: Munsell 3-10RP7/8 6. Glume color: Munsell 2-5GY6/8 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 1-10Y9/8 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2-5GY7/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5Y9/4 4. Position of ear: Pendent 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 3 6. Husk extension at harvest: 2 (Medium, up to 8 cm) Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 15.0 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 4.4 cm 3. Ear weight: 147.0 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14-16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.0 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.0 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.0 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 1-10YR7/12 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 34.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 21.0 mm 2. Cob color: Dark Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

BB211

TABLE 1D VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BB211 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Champaign, IL 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants 1488 GDD in silk: From planting to 50% of plants 1488 GDD in pollen: Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 225.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 65.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 13.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0.0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.7 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 8.0 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 90.0 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 7.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 15° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 3-5GY4/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 3 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 4 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 8.0 2. Branch angle from central spike: 20° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 40.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 6 5. Anther color: Munsell 1-10Y8.5/8 6. Glume color: Munsell 1-5GY8.5/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 1-10Y9/8 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2-5GY7/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5Y9/4 4. Position of ear: Pendent 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 2 6. Husk extension at harvest: 3 (Long, 8-10 cm beyond ear tip) Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 15.0 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 4.3 cm 3. Ear weight: 151.0 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14-16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.0 mm 2. Kernel width: 7.0 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.0 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 1-10YR8/10 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 28.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 20.0 mm 2. Cob color: Dark Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

BC146

TABLE 1E VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BC146 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Kirkland, Illinois, United States 3. Maturity: 111 Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants 1461 GDD in silk: From planting to 50% of plants 1461 GDD in pollen: Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 249.9 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 70.5 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 14.1 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.1 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 9.2 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 80.7 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6.7 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 12.2° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 7.5GY 3/4 Green 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 4 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 7 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 7 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 6.3 2. Branch angle from central spike: 35.8° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 49.1 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 7 5. Anther color: Munsell 2.5GY8/6 Green 6. Glume color: Munsell 2.5GY8/8 Green 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 2.5GY8/6 Green 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5GY7/8 Green 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2.5Y8/8 Yellow 4. Position of ear: Upright 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 5 6. Husk extension at harvest: 2.1 cm Short Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 13.3 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 46.4 mm 3. Ear weight: 134.4 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 16-18 5. Row alignment: Slightly Curved 6. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 13.4 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.9 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.2 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 2.5Y8/10 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 28.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 23.7 mm 2. Cob color: Munsell 5R6/8 Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

BBC147

TABLE 1F VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: BC147 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Kirkland, Illinois, United States 3. Maturity: 112 Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1461 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1438 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 241.7 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 76.2 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 15.4 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.7 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Faint Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 9.8 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 85.0 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6.2 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 14.8° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 7.5GY3/4 Green 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 6 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 3 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 4 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 6.3 2. Branch angle from central spike: 37.3° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 44.1 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 7 5. Anther color: Munsell 2.5GY8/6 Green 6. Glume color: Munsell 2.5GY8/6 Green 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 2.5GY8/8 Green 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2.5GY8/8 Green 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2.5Y8/6 Yellow 4. Position of ear: Upright 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 6 6. Husk extension at harvest: 2.2 cm Short Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 14.0 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 45.9 mm 3. Ear weight: 134.3 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 16 5. Row alignment: Slightly Curved 6. Ear taper: Slight Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.3 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.7 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.3 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 2.5Y7/10 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 26.8 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 23.0 mm 2. Cob color: Munsell 5R4/6 Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

CB21

TABLE 1G VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: CB21 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Lebanon, Indiana, USA 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1565 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1573 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 181.5 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 77.5 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 12.75 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 2.0 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: purple Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 8.25 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 68.5 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 25° 5. Leaf color: 7.5 GY 4/2 Munsell 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 1 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 4 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 3 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 5 2. Branch angle from central spike: 28° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 33 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 5 5. Anther color: Munsell 5 YR 6/8 6. Glume color: Munsell 7.5 GY 6/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 2.5 GY 8/10 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5GY 6/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 2.5Y 8/6 4. Position of ear: vertical Pendent 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 8 6. Husk extension at harvest: 6.98 cm Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 11.27 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 3.89 cm 3. Ear weight: 86.28 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: conico-cylindrical Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 11.25 mm 2. Kernel width: 7.7 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 3.175 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Grey 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 22.9 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 19.05 mm 2. Cob color: Red, Munsell 2.5 YR 4/6 Munsell Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

CB34

TABLE 1H VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: CB34 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Champaign, IL 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1511 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1536 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 225.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 75.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 15.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0.0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.8 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 10.0 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 80.0 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 25° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 3-5GY4/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 2 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 4 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 4.0 2. Branch angle from central spike: 15° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 40.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 6 5. Anther color: Munsell 3-10RP7/8 6. Glume color: Munsell 1-5GY9/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 1-10Y9/8 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5GY8/10 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 1-5Y8/6 4. Position of ear: Upright 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 2 6. Husk extension at harvest: Long (8-10 cm) Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 14.0 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 4.3 cm 3. Ear weight: 128.0 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14-16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.0 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.0 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.0 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 2-5Y8/12 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 33.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 21.0 mm 2. Cob color: Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

CB39

TABLE 1I VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: CB39 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Fort Branch, Indiana, USA 3. Maturity: 110 RM Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1557.5 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1494.0 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 184.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 54.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 12.3 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.7 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Faint Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 8.63 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 75.2 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.7 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 49.5° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 5GY 4/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 5.5 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 5 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 6.5 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 5.2 2. Branch angle from central spike: 52.5° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 42.5 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 6.3 5. Anther color: Munsell 2.5 GY 8/8 6. Glume color: Munsell 2.5 GY 6/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 2.5 GY 8/6 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5GY 7/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5Y 8/10 4. Position of ear: Upright 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 2.5 6. Husk extension at harvest: Short (exposed) Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 15.8 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 42.4 cm 3. Ear weight: 131.42 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 16 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Shank length: 14.15 cm 7. Ear taper: Average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 11.55 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.1 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.1 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 2.5 Y 8/10 5. Endosperm type: Normal Starch 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 30.7 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 51.5 mm 2. Cob color: Red, Munsell 10 R 4/4 Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

II15

TABLE 1J VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: II15 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Morris, Minnesota 3. Maturity: Heat Units: From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1357.8 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1320.6 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 201.5 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 76.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 17.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.1 (average of 10 plants) 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Yes Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 6.6 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 75.6 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.3 (average of 10 plants) 4. Leaf angle (from 2^(nd) leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 15-20° 5. Leaf color: 5GY 5/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = like peach fuzz): 4 7. Marginal waves (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = many): 3 8. Longitudinal creases (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = many): 3 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 7.1 (average of 10 plants) 2. Branch angle from central spike: 20-30° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 45.25 cm 4. Pollen shed (rated on scale from 0 = male sterile, to 9 = heavy shed): 3 5. Anther color: 5Y 7/6 6. Glume color: 5R 4/8-2.5GY 6/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): 2.5GY 8/6 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): 2.5GY 8/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): 2.5Y 8/2 4. Position of ear: some upright, some tilting 5. Husk tightness (rated on scale from 1 = very loose, to 9 = very tight): 6.6 6. Husk extension at harvest: to the tip Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 14.15 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 35.6 mm 3. Ear weight: 99.5 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 13.1 5. Row alignment: not straight 6. Shank length: 14.6 cm 7. Ear taper: tapered Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 12.75 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.7 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.55 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: 7.5YR 7/10 5. Endosperm type: dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 34.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 20.8 mm 2. Cob color: 5YR 7/6 Argonomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0.0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0.0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after anthesis): 0.0%

II17

TABLE 1K VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: II17 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Kenyon, Minnesota, USA 3. Maturity: Heat Units From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1470 From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1470 Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 193 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 101 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: N/A 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: green w/purple banding Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: N/A 2. Length of ear node leaf: N/A 3. Number of leaves above top ear: N/A 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): N/A 5. Leaf color: N/A 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): N/A 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 9 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 3 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: N/A 2. Branch angle from central spike: N/A 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): N/A 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 6 5. Anther color: N/A 6. Glume color: N/A 7. Tassel glume bands color: N/A Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): N/A 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): N/A 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): N/A 4. Position of ear: N/A 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 5 6. Husk extension at harvest: N/A Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: N/A 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: N/A 3. Ear weight: N/A 4. Number of kernel rows: N/A 5. Row alignment: straight 6. Ear taper: N/A Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 10 mm 2. Kernel width: 8 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 8 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: N/A 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 21 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: N/A 2. Cob color: Red Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0%

IM5

TABLE 1L VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: IM5 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Morris, Minnesota 3. Maturity: Heat Units: From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1446.5 From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1416.35 Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 212.5 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 81.0 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 12.65 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.6 (average of 10 plants) 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Yes Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 7.05 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 83.35 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 6 4. Leaf angle (from 2^(nd) leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 10-20° 5. Leaf color: 5GY 5/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = like peach fuzz): 3 7. Marginal waves (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = many): 2 8. Longitudinal creases (rated on scale from 1 = none, to 9 = many): 2 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 8 2. Branch angle from central spike: 10-15° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 46.5 cm 4. Pollen shed (rated on scale from 0 = male sterile, to 9 = heavy shed): 7 5. Anther color: 5Y 8/8 6. Glume color: 2.5GY 7/6-2.5R 4/8 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): 2.5GY 8/6 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): 2.5GY 8/6 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): 2.5Y 8/4 4. Position of ear: mostly upright, some tilting 5. Husk tightness (rated on scale from 1 = very loose, to 9 = very tight): 2.3 6. Husk extension at harvest: past the ear Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 13.3 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 42.7 mm 3. Ear weight: 111.2 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 16 5. Row alignment: not straight 6. Shank length: 10.2 cm 7. Ear taper: average Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 11.7 mm 2. Kernel width: 7.25 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 3.65 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: 5YR 6/10 5. Endosperm type: dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 26.0 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 22.3 mm 2. Cob color: 2.5YR 5/8 Argonomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0.0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0.0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after anthesis): 0

LK1

TABLE 1M VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: LK1 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Ames, IA 3. Maturity: Heat Units: From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1444 From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1414 Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 200.0 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 65.5 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 13.0 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.1 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 8.0 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 68.6 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.0 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): N/A 5. Leaf color: Yellowish green, Munsell 10GY 6/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 8 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 4 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 6 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 5.4 2. Branch angle from central spike: 42.5° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 40.0 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 3 5. Anther color: Olive, Munsell 5Y 6/8 6. Glume color: Yellow green, Munsell 2.5GY 7/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Pale yellowish green, Munsell 2.5 GY 8/10 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Greenish yellow, Munsell 2.5GY 6/8 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Yellow, Munsell 2.5Y 8/6 4. Position of ear: Pendant 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 2 6. Husk extension at harvest: N/A Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 13.7 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 4.1 cm 3. Ear weight: 87.9 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14 5. Row alignment: Slightly crooked 6. Ear taper: None Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 11.2 mm 2. Kernel width: 9.6 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 5.4 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Yellow red Munsell 7.5YR 5/8 5. Endosperm type: Dent 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 33.4 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 24.7 mm 2. Cob color: Red, Munsell 10R 4/6 Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 1.8% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 0% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

MM65

TABLE 1N VARIETY DESCRIPTION INFORMATION General Plant Information: 1. Type: MM65 is a yellow, dent corn inbred 2. Region where developed: Fort Branch, Indiana, USA 3. Maturity: 112 RM Heat Units: From planting to 50% of plants in silk: 1570.5 GDD From planting to 50% of plants in pollen: 1570.5 GDD Plant: 1. Plant height to tassel tip: 201 cm 2. Ear height to base of top ear: 50.5 cm 3. Average length of top ear internode: 7.2 cm 4. Average number of tillers: 0 5. Average number of ears per stalk: 1.3 6. Anthocyanin of brace roots: Absent Leaf: 1. Width of ear node leaf: 9.5 cm 2. Length of ear node leaf: 68.2 cm 3. Number of leaves above top ear: 5.9 4. Leaf angle (from 2nd leaf above ear at anthesis to stalk above leaf): 50° 5. Leaf color: Munsell 7.5 GY 3/4 6. Leaf sheath pubescence (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = like peach fuzz): 1 7. Marginal waves (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 2.5 8. Longitudinal creases (Rated on scale from 1 = none to 9 = many): 3 Tassel: 1. Number of lateral branches: 4.2 2. Branch angle from central spike: 67° 3. Tassel length (from top leaf collar to tassel top): 38.8 cm 4. Pollen shed (Rated on scale from 0 = male sterile to 9 = heavy shed): 8 5. Anther color: Munsell 2.5 GY 8/6 6. Glume color: Munsell 5 GY 6/6 7. Tassel glume bands color: Absent Ear (Unhusked Data): 1. Silk color (3 days after emergence): Munsell 2.5 GY 6/10 2. Fresh husk color (25 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5 GY 6/6 3. Dry husk color (65 days after 50% silking): Munsell 5Y 8/10 4. Position of ear: Horizontal 5. Husk tightness (Rated on scale from 1 = very loose to 9 = very tight): 1 6. Husk extension at harvest: Short Ear (Husked Ear Data): 1. Ear length: 17.9 cm 2. Ear diameter at mid-point: 40.7 mmm 3. Ear weight: 119.76 g 4. Number of kernel rows: 14 5. Row alignment: Straight 6. Ear taper: Slight Kernel (Dried): 1. Kernel length: 11.2 mm 2. Kernel width: 8.5 mm 3. Kernel thickness: 4.5 mm 4. Hard endosperm color: Munsell 2.5 Y 8/10 5. Endosperm type: Normal Starch 6. Weight per 100 kernels (unsized sample): 29.95 g Cob: 1. Cob diameter at mid-point: 25.7 mm 2. Cob color: Munsell N 9.3 Agronomic Traits: 1. Dropped ears (at 65 days after anthesis): 0% 2. Pre-anthesis brittle snapping: 0% 3. Pre-anthesis root lodging: 5.5% 4. Post-anthesis root lodging (at 65 days after harvest): 0%

FURTHER EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

This invention is also directed to methods for producing a corn plant by crossing a first parent corn plant with a second parent corn plant wherein either the first or second parent corn plant is an inbred corn plant of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. Further, both first and second parent corn plants can come from the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. When self-pollinated, or crossed with another inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plant, inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 will be stable while when crossed with another, different corn line, an F₁ hybrid seed is produced. Such methods of hybridization and self-pollination of corn are well known to those skilled in the art of corn breeding.

An inbred corn line has been produced through several cycles of self-pollination and is therefore to be considered as a homozygous line. An inbred line can also be produced though the dihaploid system which involves doubling the chromosomes from a haploid plant thus resulting in an inbred line that is genetically stable (homozygous) and can be reproduced without altering the inbred line. A hybrid variety is classically created through the fertilization of an ovule from an inbred parental line by the pollen of another, different inbred parental line. Due to the homozygous state of the inbred line, the produced gametes carry a copy of each parental chromosome. As both the ovule and the pollen bring a copy of the arrangement and organization of the genes present in the parental lines, the genome of each parental line is present in the resulting F₁ hybrid, theoretically in the arrangement and organization created by the plant breeder in the original parental line.

As long as the homozygosity of the parental lines is maintained, the resulting hybrid cross is stable. The F₁ hybrid is then a combination of phenotypic characteristics issued from two arrangement and organization of genes, both created by one skilled in the art through the breeding process.

Still further, this invention also is directed to methods for producing an inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65-derived corn plant by crossing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 with a second corn plant and growing the progeny seed, and repeating the crossing and growing steps with the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65-derived plant from 0 to 7 times. Thus, any such methods using the inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as a parent are within the scope of this invention, including plants derived from inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65. Advantageously, the inbred corn line is used in crosses with other, different, corn inbreds to produce first generation (F₁) corn hybrid seeds and plants with superior characteristics.

It should be understood that the inbred can, through routine manipulation of cytoplasmic or other factors, be produced in a male-sterile form. Such embodiments are also contemplated within the scope of the present claims. As used herein, the term plant includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue cultures from which corn plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, ovules, flowers, kernels, seeds, ears, cobs, leaves, husks, stalks, roots, root tips, anthers, silk and the like.

Duncan, et al., (Planta, 1985, 165:322-332) indicates that 97% of the plants cultured that produced callus were capable of plant regeneration. Subsequent experiments with both inbreds and hybrids produced 91% regenerable callus that produced plants. In a further study in 1988, Songstad, et al. (Plant Cell Reports, 7:262-265) reports several media additions that enhance regenerability of callus of two inbred lines. Other published reports also indicated that “nontraditional” tissues are capable of producing somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration. K. V. Rao et al., (Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter, 1986, 60:64-65) refer to somatic embryogenesis from glume callus cultures and B. V. Conger, et al. (Plant Cell Reports, 1987, 6:345-347) indicate somatic embryogenesis from the tissue cultures of corn leaf segments. Thus, it is clear from the literature that the state of the art is such that these methods of obtaining plants are routinely used and have a very high rate of success.

Tissue culture of corn is also described in European Patent Application, publication 160,390 and in Green and Rhodes, Maize for Biological Research, Plant Molecular Biology Association, Charlottesville, Va., 1982, 367-372. Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which upon growth and differentiation produce corn plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.

The utility of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 also extends to crosses with other species. Commonly, suitable species will be of the family Graminaceae, and especially of the genera Zea, Tripsacum, Coix, Schlerachne, Polytoca, Chionachne, and Trilobachne, of the tribe Maydeae. Potentially suitable for crosses with BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 may be the various varieties of grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.

With the advent of molecular biological techniques that have allowed the isolation and characterization of genes that encode specific protein products, scientists in the field of plant biology developed a strong interest in engineering the genome of plants to contain and express foreign genes, or additional, or modified versions of native, or endogenous, genes (perhaps driven by different promoters) in order to alter the traits of a plant in a specific manner. Such foreign additional and/or modified genes are referred to herein collectively as “transgenes.” Over the last fifteen to twenty years several methods for producing transgenic plants have been developed, and the present invention, in particular embodiments, also relates to transformed versions of the claimed inbred line. An embodiment of the present invention comprises at least one transformation event in inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.

Plant transformation involves the construction of an expression vector which will function in plant cells. Such a vector comprises DNA comprising a gene under control of, or operatively linked to, a regulatory element (for example, a promoter). The expression vector may contain one or more such operably linked gene/regulatory element combinations. The vector(s) may be in the form of a plasmid, and can be used alone or in combination with other plasmids, to provide transformed corn plants, using transformation methods as described below to incorporate transgenes into the genetic material of the corn plant(s).

Expression Vectors for Corn Transformation: Marker Genes

Expression vectors include at least one genetic marker, operably linked to a regulatory element (a promoter, for example) that allows transformed cells containing the marker to be either recovered by negative selection, i.e., inhibiting growth of cells that do not contain the selectable marker gene, or by positive selection, i.e., screening for the product encoded by the genetic marker. Many commonly used selectable marker genes for plant transformation are well known in the transformation arts, and include, for example, genes that code for enzymes that metabolically detoxify a selective chemical agent which may be an antibiotic or a herbicide, or genes that encode an altered target which is insensitive to the inhibitor. A few positive selection methods are also known in the art.

One commonly used selectable marker gene for plant transformation is the neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene, isolated from transposon Tn5, which, when placed under the control of plant regulatory signals, confers resistance to kanamycin (Fraley et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 80:4803 (1983)). Another commonly used selectable marker gene is the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene which confers resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin (Vanden Elzen et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 5:299 (1985)).

Additional selectable marker genes of bacterial origin that confer resistance to antibiotics include gentamycin acetyl transferase, streptomycin phosphotransferase, and aminoglycoside-3′-adenyl transferase, the bleomycin resistance determinant (Hayford et al., Plant Physiol. 86:1216 (1988), Jones et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 210:86 (1987), Svab et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 14:197 (1990), and Hille et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 7:171 (1986)). Other selectable marker genes confer resistance to herbicides such as glyphosate, glufosinate or bromoxynil (Comai et al., Nature 317:741-744 (1985), Gordon-Kamm et al., Plant Cell 2:603-618 (1990) and Stalker et al., Science 242:419-423 (1988)).

Selectable marker genes for plant transformation that are not of bacterial origin include, for example, mouse dihydrofolate reductase, plant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase and plant acetolactate synthase (Eichholtz et al., Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 13:67 (1987), Shah et al., Science 233:478 (1986), and Charest et al., Plant Cell Rep. 8:643 (1990)).

Another class of marker genes for plant transformation requires screening of presumptively transformed plant cells rather than direct genetic selection of transformed cells for resistance to a toxic substance such as an antibiotic. These genes are particularly useful to quantify or visualize the spatial pattern of expression of a gene in specific tissues and are frequently referred to as reporter genes because they can be fused to a gene or gene regulatory sequence for the investigation of gene expression. Commonly used genes for screening presumptively transformed cells include beta-glucuronidase (GUS), beta-galactosidase, luciferase, and chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (Jefferson, R. A., Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5:387 (1987), Teeri et al., EMBO J. 8:343 (1989), Koncz et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 84:131 (1987), and DeBlock et al., EMBO J. 3:1681 (1984). Another approach to the identification of relatively rare transformation events has been use of a gene that encodes a dominant constitutive regulator of the Zea mays anthocyanin pigmentation pathway (Ludwig et al., Science 247:449 (1990)).

In vivo methods for visualizing GUS activity that do not require destruction of plant tissue are also available. However, these in vivo methods for visualizing GUS activity have not proven useful for recovery of transformed cells because of low sensitivity, high fluorescent backgrounds and limitations associated with the use of luciferase genes as selectable markers.

A gene encoding Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) has been utilized as a marker for gene expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (Chalfie et al., Science 263:802 (1994)). GFP and mutants of GFP may be used as screenable markers.

Expression Vectors for Corn Transformation: Promoters

Genes included in expression vectors must be driven by nucleotide sequence comprising a regulatory element, for example, a promoter. Several types of promoters are now well known in the transformation arts, as are other regulatory elements that can be used alone or in combination with promoters.

As used herein, “promoter” includes reference to a region of DNA upstream from the start of transcription and involved in recognition and binding of RNA polymerase and other proteins to initiate transcription. A “plant promoter” is a promoter capable of initiating transcription in plant cells. Examples of promoters under developmental control include promoters that preferentially initiate transcription in certain organs, such as leaves, roots, seeds and tissues such as fibers, xylem vessels, tracheids, or sclerenchyma. Such promoters are referred to as “tissue-preferred.” Promoters which initiate transcription only in certain tissue are referred to as “tissue-specific.” A “cell-type” specific promoter primarily drives expression in certain cell types in one or more organs, for example, vascular cells in roots or leaves. An “inducible” promoter is a promoter which is under environmental control. Examples of environmental conditions that may effect transcription by inducible promoters include anaerobic conditions or the presence of light. Tissue-specific, tissue-preferred, cell-type specific, and inducible promoters constitute the class of “non-constitutive” promoters. A “constitutive” promoter is a promoter which is active under most environmental conditions.

A. Inducible Promoters—An inducible promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn. Optionally, the inducible promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn. With an inducible promoter the rate of transcription increases in response to an inducing agent. Any inducible promoter can be used in the instant invention. See Ward et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 22:361-366 (1993). Exemplary inducible promoters include, but are not limited to, that from the ACEI system which responds to copper (Mett et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:4567-4571 (1993)); In2 gene from maize which responds to benzenesulfonamide herbicide safeners (Gatz et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 243:32-38 (1994)) or Tet repressor from Tn10 (Gatz et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 227:229-237 (1991)). A particularly preferred inducible promoter is a promoter that responds to an inducing agent to which plants do not normally respond. An exemplary inducible promoter is the inducible promoter from a steroid hormone gene, the transcriptional activity of which is induced by a glucocorticosteroid hormone (Schena et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88:0421 (1991)).

B. Constitutive Promoters—A constitutive promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn or the constitutive promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn. Many different constitutive promoters can be utilized in the instant invention. Exemplary constitutive promoters include, but are not limited to, the promoters from plant viruses such as the 35S promoter from CaMV (Odell et al., Nature 313:810-812 (1985)) and the promoters from such genes as rice actin (McElroy et al., Plant Cell 2:163-171 (1990)); ubiquitin (Christensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 12:619-632 (1989) and Christensen et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 18:675-689 (1992)); pEMU (Last et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:581-588 (1991)); MAS (Velten et al., EMBO J. 3:2723-2730 (1984)) and maize H3 histone (Lepetit et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 231:276-285 (1992) and Atanassova et al., Plant Journal 2 (3): 291-300 (1992)).

The ALS promoter, Xbal/Ncol fragment 5′ to the Brassica napus ALS3 structural gene (or a nucleotide sequence similarity to said Xbal/Ncol fragment), represents a particularly useful constitutive promoter. See PCT application WO96/30530.

C. Tissue-specific or Tissue-preferred Promoters—A tissue-specific promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn. Optionally, the tissue-specific promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in corn. Plants transformed with a gene of interest operably linked to a tissue-specific promoter produce the protein product of the transgene exclusively, or preferentially, in a specific tissue.

Any tissue-specific or tissue-preferred promoter can be utilized in the instant invention. Exemplary tissue-specific or tissue-preferred promoters include, but are not limited to, a root-preferred promoter, such as that from the phaseolin gene (Murai et al., Science 23:476-482 (1983) and Sengupta-Gopalan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82:3320-3324 (1985)); a leaf-specific and light-induced promoter such as that from cab or rubisco (Simpson et al., EMBO J. 4(11):2723-2729 (1985) and Timko et al., Nature 318:579-582 (1985)); an anther-specific promoter such as that from LAT52 (Twell et al., Mol. Gen. Genetics 217:240-245 (1989)); a pollen-specific promoter such as that from Zm13 or a microspore-preferred promoter such as that from apg (Twell et al., Sex. Plant Reprod. 6:217-224 (1993)).

Signal Sequences for Targeting Proteins to Subcellular Compartments

Transport of protein produced by transgenes to a subcellular compartment such as the chloroplast, vacuole, peroxisome, glyoxysome, cell wall or mitochondrion or for secretion into the apoplast, is accomplished by means of operably linking the nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence to the 5′ and/or 3′ region of a gene encoding the protein of interest. Targeting sequences at the 5′ and/or 3′ end of the structural gene may determine, during protein synthesis and processing, where the encoded protein is ultimately compartmentalized.

The presence of a signal sequence directs a polypeptide to either an intracellular organelle or subcellular compartment or for secretion to the apoplast. Many signal sequences are known in the art. See, for example Becker et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 20:49 (1992), Knox, C., et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 9:3-17 (1987), Lerner et al., Plant Physiol. 91:124-129 (1989), Fontes et al., Plant Cell 3:483-496 (1991), Matsuoka et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:834 (1991), Gould et al., J. Cell. Biol. 108:1657 (1989), Creissen et al., Plant J. 2:129 (1991), Kalderon, et al., Cell 39:499-509 (1984), Stiefel, et al., Plant Cell 2:785-793 (1990).

Foreign Protein Genes and Agronomic Genes

With transgenic plants according to the present invention, a foreign protein can be produced in commercial quantities. Thus, techniques for the selection and propagation of transformed plants, which are well understood in the art, yield a plurality of transgenic plants which are harvested in a conventional manner, and a foreign protein then can be extracted from a tissue of interest or from total biomass. Protein extraction from plant biomass can be accomplished by known methods which are discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr, Anal. Biochem. 114:92-6 (1981).

According to a preferred embodiment, the transgenic plant provided for commercial production of foreign protein is corn. In another preferred embodiment, the biomass of interest is seed. For the relatively small number of transgenic plants that show higher levels of expression, a genetic map can be generated, primarily via conventional RFLP, PCR and SSR analysis, which identifies the approximate chromosomal location of the integrated DNA molecule. For exemplary methodologies in this regard, see Glick and Thompson, Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology CRC Press, Boca Raton 269:284 (1993). Map information concerning chromosomal location is useful for proprietary protection of a subject transgenic plant. If unauthorized propagation is undertaken and crosses made with other germplasm, the map of the integration region can be compared to similar maps for suspect plants, to determine if the latter have a common parentage with the subject plant. Map comparisons would involve hybridizations, RFLP, PCR, SSR and sequencing, all of which are conventional techniques.

Likewise, by means of the present invention, agronomic genes can be expressed in transformed plants. More particularly, plants can be genetically engineered to express various phenotypes of agronomic interest. Exemplary genes implicated in this regard include, but are not limited to, those categorized below:

1. Genes that Confer Resistance to Pests or Disease and that Encode:

A. Plant disease resistance genes. Plant defences are often activated by specific interaction between the product of a disease resistance gene (R) in the plant and the product of a corresponding avirulence (Avr) gene in the pathogen. A plant inbred line can be transformed with cloned resistance gene to engineer plants that are resistant to specific pathogen strains. See, for example Jones et al., Science 266:789 (1994) (cloning of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum); Martin et al., Science 262:1432 (1993) (tomato Pto gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato encodes a protein kinase); Mindrinos et al., Cell 78:1089 (1994) (Arabidopsis RSP2 gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae).

B. A Bacillus thuringiensis protein, a derivative thereof or a synthetic polypeptide modeled thereon. See, for example, Geiser et al., Gene 48:109 (1986), who disclose the cloning and nucleotide sequence of a Bt alpha-endotoxin gene. Moreover, DNA molecules encoding alpha-endotoxin genes can be purchased from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va., for example, under ATCC Accession Numbers 40098, 67136, 31995 and 31998.

C. A lectin. See, for example, the article by Van Damme et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24:25 (1994), who disclose the nucleotide sequences of several Clivia miniata mannose-binding lectin genes.

D. A vitamin-binding protein such as avidin. See PCT application US 93/06487. The application teaches the use of avidin and avidin homologues as larvicides against insect pests.

E. An enzyme inhibitor, for example, a protease or proteinase inhibitor or an amylase inhibitor. See, for example, Abe et al., J. Biol. Chem. 262:16793 (1987) (nucleotide sequence of rice cysteine proteinase inhibitor), Huub et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:985 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of cDNA encoding tobacco proteinase inhibitor I), Sumitani et al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57:1243 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of Streptomyces nitrosporeus alpha-amylase inhibitor).

F. An insect-specific hormone or pheromone such as an ecdysteroid or juvenile hormone, a variant thereof, a mimetic based thereon, or an antagonist or agonist thereof. See, for example, the disclosure by Hammock et al., Nature 344:458 (1990), of baculovirus expression of cloned juvenile hormone esterase, an inactivator of juvenile hormone.

G. An insect-specific peptide or neuropeptide which, upon expression, disrupts the physiology of the affected pest. For example, see the disclosures of Pratt et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 163:1243 (1989) (an allostatin is identified in Diploptera puntata). See also U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,317 to Tomalski et al., who disclose genes encoding insect-specific, paralytic neurotoxins.

H. An insect-specific venom produced in nature by a snake, a wasp, etc. For example, see Pang et al., Gene 116:165 (1992), for disclosure of heterologous expression in plants of a gene coding for a scorpion insectotoxic peptide.

I. An enzyme responsible for a hyper-accumulation of a monoterpene, a sesquiterpene, a steroid, a hydroxamic acid, a phenylpropanoid derivative or another non-protein molecule with insecticidal activity.

J. An enzyme involved in the modification, including the post-translational modification, of a biologically active molecule; for example, a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic enzyme, a lipolytic enzyme, a nuclease, a cyclase, a transaminase, an esterase, a hydrolase, a phosphatase, a kinase, a phosphorylase, a polymerase, an elastase, a chitinase and a glucanase, whether natural or synthetic. See PCT application WO 93/02197 in the name of Scott et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a callase gene. DNA molecules which contain chitinase-encoding sequences can be obtained, for example, from the ATCC under Accession Numbers 39637 and 67152. See also Kramer et al., Insect Biochem. Molec. Biol. 23:691 (1993), who teach the nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding tobacco hornworm chitinase, and Kawalleck et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:673 (1993), who provide the nucleotide sequence of the parsley ubi4-2 polyubiquitin gene.

K. A molecule that stimulates signal transduction. For example, see the disclosure by Botella et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 24:757 (1994), of nucleotide sequences for mung bean calmodulin cDNA clones, and Griess et al., Plant Physiol. 104:1467 (1994), who provide the nucleotide sequence of a maize calmodulin cDNA clone.

L. A hydrophobic moment peptide. See PCT application WO95/16776 (disclosure of peptide derivatives of Tachyplesin which inhibit fungal plant pathogens) and PCT application WO 95/18855 (teaches synthetic antimicrobial peptides that confer disease resistance).

M. A membrane permease, a channel former or a channel blocker. For example, see the disclosure of Jaynes et al., Plant Sci 89:43 (1993), of heterologous expression of a cecropin-beta, lytic peptide analog to render transgenic tobacco plants resistant to Pseudomonas solanacearum.

N. A viral-invasive protein or a complex toxin derived therefrom. For example, the accumulation of viral coat proteins in transformed plant cells imparts resistance to viral infection and/or disease development effected by the virus from which the coat protein gene is derived, as well as by related viruseS. See Beachy et al., Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 28:451 (1990). Coat protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upon transformed plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco etch virus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus. Id.

O. An insect-specific antibody or an immunotoxin derived therefrom. Thus, an antibody targeted to a critical metabolic function in the insect gut would inactivate an affected enzyme, killing the insect.

P. A virus-specific antibody. See, for example, Tavladoraki et al., Nature 366:469 (1993), who show that transgenic plants expressing recombinant antibody genes are protected from virus attack.

Q. A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a pathogen or a parasite. Thus, fungal endo-alpha-1,4-D-polygalacturonases facilitate fungal colonization and plant nutrient release by solubilising plant cell wall homo-alpha-1,4-D-galacturonase. See Lamb et al., BioTechnology 10:1436 (1992). The cloning and characterization of a gene which encodes a bean endopolygalacturonase-inhibiting protein is described by Toubart et al., Plant J 2:367 (1992).

R. A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a plant. For example, Logemann et al., BioTechnology 10:305 (1992), have shown that transgenic plants expressing the barley ribosome-inactivating gene have an increased resistance to fungal disease.

2. Genes that Confer Resistance to an Herbicide, For Example:

A. An herbicide that inhibits the growing point or meristem, such as an imidazolinone or a sulfonylurea. Exemplary genes in this category code for mutant ALS and AHAS enzyme as described, for example, by Lee et al., EMBO J. 7:1241 (1988), and Mild et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 80:449 (1990), respectively.

B. Glyphosate (resistance conferred by mutant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSP) and aroA genes, respectively) and other phosphono compounds such as glufosinate (phosphinothricin acetyl transferase (PAT) and Streptomyces hygroscopicus (PAT bar genes), and pyridinoxy or phenoxy propionic acids and cyclohexones (ACCase inhibitor-encoding genes). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,835 to Shah et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a form of EPSP which can confer glyphosate resistance. A DNA molecule encoding a mutant aroA gene can be obtained under ATCC accession number 39256, and the nucleotide sequence of the mutant gene is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,061 to Comai. European patent application No. 0 333 033 to Kumada et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374 to Goodman et al., disclose nucleotide sequences of glutamine synthetase genes which confer resistance to herbicides such as L-phosphinothricin. The nucleotide sequence of a PAT gene is provided in European application No. 0 242 246 to Leemans et al. DeGreef et al., BioTechnology 7:61 (1989), describe the production of transgenic plants that express chimeric bar genes coding for PAT activity. Exemplary of genes conferring resistance to phenoxy propionic acids and cyclohexones, such as sethoxydim and haloxyfop are the ABC5-S1, ABC5-S2 and ABC5-S3 genes described by Marshall et al., Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:435 (1992).

C. An herbicide that inhibits photosynthesis, such as a triazine (psbA and gs+ genes) or a benzonitrile (nitrilase gene). Przibilla et al., Plant Cell 3:169 (1991), describe the transformation of Chlamydomonas with plasmids encoding mutant psbA genes. Nucleotide sequences for nitrilase genes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648 to Stalker, and DNA molecules containing these genes are available under ATCC Accession Numbers 53435, 67441, and 67442. Cloning and expression of DNA coding for a glutathione S-transferase is described by Hayes et al., Biochem. J. 285:173 (1992).

3. Genes that Confer or Contribute to a Value-Added Trait, such as:

A. Modified fatty acid metabolism, for example, by transforming a plant with an antisense gene of stearyl-ACP desaturase to increase stearic acid content of the plant. See Knutzon et al., Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U.S.A. 89:2624 (1992)

B. Increased resistance to high light stress such as photo-oxidative damages, for example by transforming a plant with a gene coding for a protein of the Early Light Induced Protein family (BLIP) as described in WO 03/074713 in the name of Biogemma.

C. Modified carbohydrate composition effected, for example, by transforming plants with a gene coding for an enzyme that alters the branching pattern of starch. See Shiroza et al., J. Bact. 170:810 (1988) (nucleotide sequence of Streptococcus mutants fructosyltransferase gene), Steinmetz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 20:220 (1985) (nucleotide sequence of Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene), Pen et al., BioTechnology 10:292 (1992) (production of transgenic plants that express Bacillus lichenifonnis α-amylase), Elliot et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:515 (1993) (nucleotide sequences of tomato invertase genes), Sogaard et al., J. Biol. Chem. 268:22480 (1993) (site-directed mutagenesis of barley alpha-amylase gene), and Fisher et al., Plant Physiol. 102:1045 (1993) (maize endosperm starch branching enzyme II).

D. Increased resistance/tolerance to water stress or drought, for example, by transforming a plant to create a plant having a modified content in ABA-Water-Stress-Ripening-Induced proteins (ARS proteins) as described in WO 01/83753 in the name of Biogemma, or by transforming a plant with a nucleotide sequence coding for a phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase as shown in WO 02/081714. The tolerance of corn to drought can also be increased by an overexpression of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC-C4), obtained, for example from sorghum.

E. Increased content of cysteine and glutathione, useful in the regulation of sulfur compounds and plant resistance against various stresses such as drought, heat or cold, by transforming a plant with a gene coding for an Adenosine 5′ Phosphosulfate as shown in WO 01/49855.

F. Increased nutritional quality, for example, by introducing a zein gene which genetic sequence has been modified so that its protein sequence has an increase in lysine and proline. The increased nutritional quality can also be attained by introducing into the maize plant an albumin 2S gene from sunflower that has been modified by the addition of the KDEL peptide sequence to keep and accumulate the albumin protein in the endoplasmic reticulum.

G. Decreased phytate content: 1) Introduction of a phytase-encoding gene would enhance breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to the transformed plant. For example, see Van Hartingsveldt et al., Gene 127:87 (1993), for a disclosure of the nucleotide sequence of an Aspergillus niger phytase gene. 2) A gene could be introduced that reduced phytate content. In maize, this, for example, could be accomplished, by cloning and then reintroducing DNA associated with the single allele which is responsible for maize mutants characterized by low levels of phytic acid. See Raboy et al., Maydica 35:383 (1990).

4. Genes that Control Male Sterility

A. Introduction of a deacetylase gene under the control of a tapetum-specific promoter and with the application of the chemical N-Ac-PPT. See international publication WO 01/29237.

B. Introduction of various stamen-specific promoters. See international publications WO 92/13956 and WO 92/13957.

C. Introduction of the barnase and the barstar genes. See Paul et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 19:611-622, 1992).

Examples of Transgenes

MON810, also known as MON810Bt or BT1, is the designation given by the Monsanto Company (St. Louis, Mo.) for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis and certain other Lepidopteran larvae.

MON603, also known as MON603RR2, better known as NK603, is the designation for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent on the crop. Another transgenic event, GA21, when expressed in maize, also allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent on the crop.

MON89034, a designation given by the Monsanto Company (St. Louis, Mo.) for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda, and certain other Lepidopteran larvae.

MON88017, also known as MON88017CCR1, is the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, allows the use of glyphosate as a weed control agent. In addition, this event produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the corn root worm, Diabrotica virgifera, and certain other Coleopteran larvae.

HERCULEX Corn Borer, better known as HX1 or TC1507, is the designation for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis, and certain other Lepidopteran larvae. In addition, the transgenic event was developed to allow the crop to be tolerant to the use of glufosinate ammonium, the active ingredient in phosphinothricin herbicides.

HERCULEX Root Worm, or DAS59122-7, is the designation for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, produces an endotoxin that is efficacious against the corn root worm, Diabrotica virgifera, and certain other Coleopteran larvae. In addition, the transgenic event was developed to allow the crop to be tolerant to the use of glufosinate ammonium, the active ingredient in phosphinothricin herbicides.

T25 is the designation for the transgenic event that, when expressed in maize, allows the crop to be tolerant to the use of glufosinate ammonium, the active ingredient in phosphinothricin herbicides.

Methods for Corn Transformation

Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, including biological and physical plant transformation protocols. See, for example, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 67-88. In addition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods for plant cell or tissue transformation and regeneration of plants are available. See, for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Glick B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 89-119.

A. Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation—One method for introducing an expression vector into plants is based on the natural transformation system of Agrobacterium. See, for example, Horsch et al., Science 227:1229 (1985). A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes are plant pathogenic soil bacteria which genetically transform plant cells. The Ti and Ri plasmids of A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes, respectively, carry genes responsible for genetic transformation of the plant. See, for example, Kado, C. I., Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 10:1 (1991). Descriptions of Agrobacterium vector systems and methods for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer are provided by Gruber et al., supra, Mild et al., supra, and Moloney et al., Plant Cell Reports 8:238 (1989). See also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan. 7, 1997.

B. Direct Gene Transfer—Despite the fact the host range for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is broad, some major cereal crop species and gymnosperms have generally been recalcitrant to this mode of gene transfer, even though some success has recently been achieved in rice and corn. Hiei et al., The Plant Journal 6:271-282 (1994) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan. 7, 1997. Several methods of plant transformation, collectively referred to as direct gene transfer, have been developed as an alternative to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.

A generally applicable method of plant transformation is microprojectile-mediated transformation wherein DNA is carried on the surface of microprojectiles measuring 1 to 4 micron. The expression vector is introduced into plant tissues with a biolistic device that accelerates the microprojectiles to speeds of 300 to 600 m/s which is sufficient to penetrate plant cell walls and membranes. Sanford et al., Part. Sci. Technol. 5:27 (1987), Sanford, J. C., Trends Biotech. 6:299 (1988), Klein et al., BioTechnology 6:559-563 (1988), Sanford, J. C., Physiol Plant 7:206 (1990), Klein et al., BioTechnology 10:268 (1992). In corn, several target tissues can be bombarded with DNA-coated microprojectiles in order to produce transgenic plants, including, for example, callus (Type I or Type II), immature embryos, and meristematic tissue.

Another method for physical delivery of DNA to plants is sonication of target cells. Zhang et al., BioTechnology 9:996 (1991). Alternatively, liposome and spheroplast fusion have been used to introduce expression vectors into plants. Deshayes et al., EMBO J., 4:2731 (1985), Christou et al., Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84:3962 (1987). Direct uptake of DNA into protoplasts using CaCl₂ precipitation, polyvinyl alcohol or poly-L-ornithine has also been reported. Hain et al., Mol. Gen. Genet. 199:161 (1985) and Draper et al., Plant Cell Physiol. 23:451 (1982). Electroporation of protoplasts and whole cells and tissues have also been described. D'Halluin et al., Plant Cell 4:1495-1505 (1992) and Spencer et al., Plant Mol. Biol. 24:51-61 (1994).

Following transformation of corn target tissues, expression of the above-described selectable marker genes allows for preferential selection of transformed cells, tissues and/or plants, using regeneration and selection methods now well known in the art.

The foregoing methods for transformation would typically be used for producing a transgenic inbred line. The transgenic inbred line could then be crossed, with another (non-transformed or transformed) inbred line, in order to produce a new transgenic inbred line. Alternatively, a genetic trait which has been engineered into a particular corn line using the foregoing transformation techniques could be moved into another line using traditional backcrossing techniques that are well known in the plant breeding arts. For example, a backcrossing approach could be used to move an engineered trait from a public, non-elite inbred line into an elite inbred line, or from an inbred line containing a foreign gene in its genome into an inbred line or lines which do not contain that gene. As used herein, “crossing” can refer to a simple X by Y cross, or the process of backcrossing, depending on the context.

When the term inbred corn plant is used in the context of the present invention, this also includes any inbred corn plant where one or more desired traits have been introduced through backcrossing methods, whether such trait is a naturally occurring one or a transgenic one. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce one or more characteristic into the inbred. The term backcrossing as used herein refers to the repeated crossing of a hybrid progeny back to one of the parental corn plants for that inbred. The parental corn plant which contributes the gene or the genes for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental corn plant to which the gene or genes from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol (Fehr, 1987).

In a typical backcross protocol, the original inbred of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second inbred (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the gene or genes of interest to be transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a corn plant is obtained wherein all the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in the converted plant in addition to the gene or genes transferred from the nonrecurrent parent. It should be noted that some, one, two, three or more, self-pollination and growing of a population might be included between two successive backcrosses. Indeed, an appropriate selection in the population produced by the self-pollination, i.e., selection for the desired trait and physiological and morphological characteristics of the recurrent parent might be equivalent to one, two or even three additional backcrosses in a continuous series without rigorous selection, saving time, money and effort for the breeder. The backcross process could also be accelerated through a step of haploid induction together by a molecular marker screening to identify the backcross progeny plants that have the closest genetic resemblance with the recurrent line, together with the gene or genes of interest to be transferred. A non limiting example of such a protocol would be the following: a) the first generation F₁ produced by the cross of the recurrent parent A by the donor parent B is backcrossed to parent A, b) selection is practiced for the plants having the desired trait of parent B, c) selected plants are self-pollinated to produce a population of plants where selection is practiced for the plants having the desired trait of parent B and the physiological and morphological characteristics of parent A, d) the selected plants are backcrossed one, two, three, four, five or more times to parent A to produce selected backcross progeny plants comprising the desired trait of parent B and the physiological and morphological characteristics of parent A. Step c) may or may not be repeated and included between the backcrosses of step d. Step c) may or may not be followed by a step of haploid induction followed by molecular marker screening.

The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute one or more trait(s) or characteristic(s) in the original inbred. To accomplish this, a gene or genes of the recurrent inbred is modified or substituted with the desired gene or genes from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological, constitution of the original inbred. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross; one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable, agronomically important trait(s) to the plant. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic(s) or trait(s) being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a single gene and dominant allele, multiple genes and recessive allele(s) may also be transferred and therefore, backcross breeding is by no means restricted to character(s) governed by one or a few genes. In fact the number of genes might be less important than the identification of the character(s) in the segregating population. In this instance it may then be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic(s) has been successfully transferred. Such tests encompass not only visual inspection and simple crossing, but also follow up of the characteristic(s) through genetically associated markers and molecular assisted breeding tools. For example, selection of progeny containing the transferred trait is done by direct selection, visual inspection for a trait associated with a dominant allele, while the selection of progeny for a trait that is transferred via a recessive allele, such as the waxy starch characteristic, require selfing the progeny to determine which plant carry the recessive allele(s).

Many single gene traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single gene traits may or may not be transgenic, i.e., they may be naturally present in the nonrecurrent parent, examples of these traits include but are not limited to, male sterility, waxy starch, amylose starch, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility, water stress tolerance, enhanced nutritional quality, industrial usage, increased digestibility, yield stability and yield enhancement. An example of this is the Rp1D gene which controls resistance to rust fungus by preventing P. sorghi from producing spores. The Rp1D gene is usually preferred over the other Rp genes because it is widely effective against all races of rust, but the emergence of new races has lead to the use of other Rp genes comprising, for example, the Rp1E, Rp1G, Rp1I, Rp1K or “compound” genes which combine two or more Rp genes including Rp1GI, Rp1GDJ, etc. These genes are generally inherited through the nucleus. Some known exceptions to this are the genes for male sterility, some of which are inherited cytoplasmically, but still act as single gene traits. Several of these single gene traits are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,777,196; 5,948,957 and 5,969,212, the disclosures of which are specifically hereby incorporated by reference. Genes related to digestibility are known to one skilled in the art, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,20,302, 8,143,482 and 8,088,95. Each of the references mentioned above is herein incorporated into reference by its entirety.

In 1981, the backcross method of breeding accounted for 17% of the total breeding effort for inbred line development in the United States, according to, Hallauer, A. R. et al., (1988) “Corn Breeding” in Corn and Corn Improvement, No. 18, pp. 463-481. The backcross breeding method provides a precise way of improving varieties that excel in a large number of attributes but are deficient in a few characteristics (Allard, 1960, Principles of Plant Breeding, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.). The method makes use of a series of backcrosses to the variety to be improved during which the character or the characters in which improvement is sought is maintained by selection. At the end of the backcrossing, the gene or genes being transferred unlike all other genes will be heterozygous. Selfing after the last backcross produces homozygosity for this gene pair(s) and, coupled with selection, will result in a variety with exactly the adaptation, yielding ability and quality characteristics of the recurrent parent but superior to that parent in the particular characteristic(s) for which the improvement program was undertaken. Therefore, this method provides the plant breeder with a high degree of genetic control of his work.

Backcrossing is a powerful mechanism for achieving homozygosity and any population obtained by backcrossing may rapidly converge on the genotype of the recurrent parent. When backcrossing is made the basis of a plant breeding program, the genotype of the recurrent parent will be modified with regards to genes being transferred, which are maintained in the population by selection.

Examples of successful backcrosses are the transfer of stem rust resistance from “Hope” wheat to “Bart” wheat and the transfer of bunt resistance to “Bart” wheat to create “Bart 38” which has resistance to both stem rust and bunt. Also highlighted by Allard is the successful transfer of mildew, leaf spot and wilt resistances in “California Common” alfalfa to create “Caliverde.” This new “Caliverde” variety produced through the backcross process is indistinguishable from “California Common” except for its resistance to the three named diseases.

One of the advantages of the backcross method is that the breeding program can be carried out in almost every environment that will allow the development of the character being transferred. Another advantage of the backcross method is that more than one character or trait can be transferred, either through several backcrosses or through the use of transformation and then backcrossing.

The backcross technique is not only desirable when breeding for disease resistance but also for the adjustment of morphological characters, color characteristics and simply inherited quantitative characters such as earliness, plant height and seed size and shape. In this regard, a medium grain type variety, “Calady,” has been produced by Jones and Davis. In dealing with quantitative characteristics, they selected the donor parent with the view of sacrificing some of the intensity of the character for which it was chosen, i.e., grain size. “Lady Wright,” a long grain variety was used as the donor parent and “Coloro,” a short grain one as the recurrent parent. After four backcrosses, the medium grain type variety “Calady” was produced.

Deposit Information

A deposit of the inbred corn line of this invention is maintained by AgReliant Genetics, LLC, 4640 East SR32, Lebanon, Ind. 46052. AgReliant maintains the seed deposit on behalf of Limagrain Europe and KWS SAAT AG. In addition, a sample of the inbred corn seed of this invention has been or will be deposited with the American Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110 or the National Collections of Industrial, Food and Marine Bacteria (NCIMB), 23 St Machar Drive, Aberdeen, Scotland, AB24 3RY, United Kingdom.

To satisfy the enablement requirements of 35 U.S.C. 112, and to certify that the deposit of the isolated strain (i.e., corn inbred) of the present invention meets the criteria set forth in 37 CFR 1.801-1.809 and Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) 2402-2411.05, Applicants hereby make the following statements regarding the deposited corn inbred lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 (deposited as ATCC Accession No. ______):

If the deposit is made under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, the instant invention will be irrevocably and without restriction released to the public upon the granting of a patent.

If the deposit is made not under the terms of the Budapest Treaty, Applicant(s) provides assurance of compliance by following statements:

1. During the pendency of this application, access to the invention will be afforded to the Commissioner upon request;

2. All restrictions on availability to the public will be irrevocably removed upon granting of the patent under conditions specified in 37 CFR 1.808;

3. The deposit will be maintained in a public repository for a period of 30 years or 5 years after the last request or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer;

4. A test of the viability of the biological material at the time of deposit will be conducted by the public depository under 37 CFR 1.807; and

5. The deposit will be replaced if it should ever become unavailable.

Access to this deposit will be available during the pendency of this application to persons determined by the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks to be entitled thereto under 37 C.F.R. §1.14 and 35 U.S.C. §122. Upon granting of any claims in this application, all restrictions on the availability to the public of the variety will be irrevocably removed by affording access to a deposit of at least 2,500 seeds of the same variety with the ATCC or NCIMB.

INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY

Corn is used as human food, livestock feed, and as raw material in industry. The food uses of corn, in addition to human consumption of corn kernels, include both products of dry- and wet-milling industries. The principal products of corn dry-milling are grits, meal and flour. Corn meal is flour ground to fine, medium, and coarse consistencies from dried corn. In the United States, the finely ground corn meal is also referred to as corn flour. However, the term “corn flour” denotes corn starch in the United Kingdom. Corn meal has a long shelf life and is used to produce an assortment of products, including but not limited to tortillas, taco shells, bread, cereal and muffins.

The corn wet-milling industry can provide corn starch, corn syrups, corn sweeteners and dextrose for food use. Corn syrup is used in foods to soften texture, add volume, prevent crystallization of sugar and enhance flavor. Corn syrup is distinct from high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), which is created when corn syrup undergoes enzymatic processing, producing a sweeter compound that contains higher levels of fructose.

Corn oil is recovered from corn germ, which is a by-product of both dry- and wet-milling industries. Corn oil which is high in mono and poly unsaturated fats, is used for reducing fat and trans fat in numerous food products.

Corn, including both grain and non-grain portions of the plant, is also used extensively as livestock feed, primarily for beef cattle, dairy cattle, hogs and poultry.

Industrial uses of corn include production of ethanol, corn starch in the wet-milling industry and corn flour in the dry-milling industry. Corn ethanol is ethanol produced from corn as a biomass through industrial fermentation, chemical processing and distillation. Corn is the main feedstock used for producing ethanol fuel in the United States. The industrial applications of corn starch and flour are based on functional properties, such as viscosity, film formation, adhesive properties, and ability to suspend particles. Corn starch and flour also have application in the paper and textile industries. Other industrial uses include applications in adhesives, building materials, foundry binders, laundry starches, explosives, oil-well muds and other mining applications.

Plant parts other than the grain of corn are also used in industry, for example, stalks and husks are made into paper and wallboard and cobs are used for fuel and to make charcoal.

The seed of inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, the plant produced from the inbred seed, the hybrid corn plant produced from the crossing of the inbred, hybrid seed, and various parts of the hybrid corn plant and transgenic versions of the foregoing, can be utilized for human food, livestock feed, and as a raw material in industry.

Tables of Field Test Trials

In the tables that follow, exemplary traits and characteristics of hybrid combinations having inbred corn lines BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as a parental line are given compared to other hybrids. The data collected are presented for key characteristics and traits. The field tests are experimental trials and have been made at numerous locations, with one or two replications per location under supervision of the applicant. Information about these experimental hybrids as compared to the check hybrids is presented.

Field Test Trials:

Information for each pedigree includes:

-   -   1. Mean yield of the hybrid (YLD) across all locations         (bushels/acre) is shown in column 3.     -   2. A mean for the percentage moisture (Mst %) for the hybrid         across all locations is shown in column 4     -   3. A mean of the yield divided by the percentage moisture (Y/M)         for the hybrid across all locations is shown in column 5.     -   4. Test weight (TWgt) is the grain density as measured in pounds         per bushel and is shown in column 6     -   5. A mean of the percentage of plants with stalk lodging (SL %)         across all locations is shown in column 7.     -   6. A mean of the percentage of plants with root lodging (RL %)         across all locations is shown in column 8.     -   7. Ear Height (EHT) is a physical measurement taken from the         ground level to the node of attachment for the upper ear. It is         expressed to the nearest tenth of a foot and is shown in column         9.     -   8. Plant Height (PLHT) is a physical measurement taken from the         ground level to the tip of the tassel. It is expressed to the         nearest tenth of a foot and is shown in column 10.     -   9. Harvest Appearance (HA n) is a rating made by a trained         person on the date of harvest. Harvest appearance is the rater's         impression of the hybrid based on, but not limited to, a         combination of factors to include plant intactness, tissue         health appearance and ease of harvest as it relates to stalk         lodging and root lodging. A scale of 1=Lowest to 9=Highest/Most         Desirable is used and is listed in column 11.

BB208

TABLE 2-1 Comparative Data for 212US01109, a Hybrid Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 12 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 210UM01241 + 603 HCL112RR2 × HCL437 162.8 16.0 10.2 56.6 0.6 3.1 3.3 8.9 4.0 9DKC52-59 9DKC52-59 169.7 16.2 10.5 54.9 8.9 1.6 3.8 8.9 4.1 212US01109 BB208 × ML12 180.1 18.0 10.0 55.2 −0.1 10.8 4.1 10.3 4.6 9P0463XR 9P0463XR 173.9 18.5 9.4 57.0 0.2 3.0 3.6 9.0 6.0 208UE01323 + NZR HCL301RR2 × HCL516BT1 175.8 19.0 9.3 55.7 5.8 11.6 3.3 8.9 4.0 210UA02090 + VTU R6258RMQKZ × ML8 186.2 19.1 9.7 55.0 5.2 4.2 3.9 9.7 5.7 206UR01913 + G21 NP2660GT × NP2727 162.3 19.1 8.5 55.7 0.7 15.1 3.9 10.0 5.6

TABLE 2-2 Comparative Data for 212US01103, a Hybrid Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 19 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212US01103 BB208 × ML8 173.8 17.2 10.1 54.9 4.9 1.4 3.6 8.8 5.1 9DKC52-59 9DKC52-59 175.5 18.1 9.7 56.2 4.3 0.4 3.5 8.1 4.8 210UR01119 + GSS R6258RMQKZ × R2683LMSLZ 165.2 19.5 8.5 56.9 3.3 1.8 3.8 9.0 5.8 206UR01913 + G21 NP2660GT × NP2727 162.9 19.7 8.3 56.4 2.7 5.8 3.7 8.9 6.0 208UE01323 + NZR HCL301RR2 × HCL516BT1 164.0 20.1 8.2 56.5 5.0 4.0 3.4 8.3 4.8

TABLE 2-3 Comparative Data for 212US01104 and 212US01110, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212US01104 BB208 × ML9 185.2 15.3 12.1 59.1 1.1 4.6 3.0 8.1 5.0 212UE01938 + VTU R9540RMQKZ × HCL5015 173.4 15.4 11.3 60.1 1.6 3.9 2.9 8.2 5.2 212US01110 BB208 × MM53 191.8 15.9 12.1 58.8 2.7 5.3 3.1 8.3 4.9 9DKC53-78 9DKC53-78 176.9 16.0 11.1 59.4 1.8 0.0 2.9 7.8 5.2 9P0115AM1 9P0115AM1 175.4 16.3 10.8 59.1 0.3 9.4 3.1 8.0 5.2 210UA02168 + 603 SGI064RHTTZ × SGI065 180.9 16.9 10.7 58.2 10.4 0.2 3.2 7.8 4.3 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 197.3 17.3 11.4 56.3 1.0 5.6 3.4 9.2 5.8 210US02194 + VTU F4780RMQKZ × T5972Z 187.3 17.7 10.6 58.1 3.0 4.0 3.1 8.4 5.5 210UA02091 + AG4 NP2660GTCBLLRW × NP2727 183.1 17.9 10.2 56.5 0.3 7.3 3.6 9.2 6.3 210UA02090 + VTU R6258RMQKZ × ML8 178.8 19.3 9.3 55.7 0.8 3.6 3.5 8.5 5.8

TABLE 2-4 Comparative Data for 212US02336 + VTU, 212US02337 + VTU, and 212US02338 + VTU, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 9 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 210UA02079 + YGC R2999RBDHZ × HCL4003BT1 161.5 14.8 10.9 61.3 0.5 3.8 4.4 212US02338 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM53 191.3 15.7 12.2 60.3 0.0 2.0 4.7 210UR01118 + VTU HCL112CCR1 × A5338ZNYKZ 166.7 15.7 10.6 60.7 0.0 0.0 4.7 212UE01938 + VTU R9540RMQKZ × HCL5015 172.6 16.0 10.8 60.1 0.0 0.0 4.9 212US02336 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML8 185.4 16.5 11.2 59.2 0.2 1.3 4.7 210US02194 + VTU F4780RMQKZ × T5972Z 186.4 18.2 10.2 58.3 0.6 3.5 5.9 212US02337 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML12 192.1 19.5 9.9 56.7 0.5 1.4 5.3 210UA02090 + VTU R6258RMQKZ × ML8 183.1 20.0 9.2 57.0 0.1 1.7 6.0

TABLE 2-5 Comparative Data for 212US02338 + VTU, a Hybrid Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 10 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212US02338 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM53 215.9 17.5 12.3 53.5 0.1 0.3 4.0 9.7 5.6 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 212.2 17.7 12.0 54.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 9.8 5.7 213UR02175 + GSS R2999GJLHZ × R3414LFWMZ 194.8 17.8 10.9 55.8 0.0 0.0 4.1 9.0 6.3 211UC01094 + 017 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 214.5 18.4 11.7 52.4 0.1 0.0 4.3 9.8 6.2

TABLE 2-6 Comparative Data for 212US01110, a Hybrid Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 24 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212US01110 BB208 × MM53 197.2 19.7 10.0 52.9 1.4 3.0 4.0 9.9 5.3 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 198.9 20.3 9.8 54.3 0.6 0.1 3.6 9.0 5.9 212UC00890 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × ML9 191.7 20.5 9.4 53.6 0.1 0.1 3.8 9.5 6.1 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 199.4 21.1 9.5 54.6 0.0 0.0 4.1 9.4 6.3 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 194.5 21.1 9.2 52.8 0.0 1.5 3.8 9.1 5.7 9P0533AM1 9P0533AM1 202.2 21.6 9.4 55.2 0.1 0.7 3.5 9.1 5.3 211UA02203 + VTU MEF2526RMQKZ × HCL4029 191.2 21.8 8.8 54.9 0.0 0.5 3.5 9.1 5.6

TABLE 2-7 Comparative Data for 212US02336 + VTU, 212US02337 + VTU, and 212US02338 + VTU, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 16 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212US02336 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML8 194.6 17.0 11.4 52.2 1.5 0.3 4.3 10.3 5.6 212US02338 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM53 208.7 19.3 10.8 53.1 0.5 1.8 4.0 10.6 5.1 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 194.7 19.9 9.8 53.1 0.0 1.9 4.3 11.2 5.9 212US02337 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML12 203.0 20.0 10.2 53.3 0.6 4.2 4.3 10.3 5.9 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 193.7 20.1 9.6 54.8 0.4 3.0 4.6 10.2 6.3 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 194.9 20.2 9.6 55.0 0.0 0.2 3.9 10.2 6.0 212UC00890 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × ML9 196.3 20.5 9.6 53.7 0.0 5.6 4.1 10.9 6.2 211UA02203 + VTU MEF2526RMQKZ × HCL4029 188.9 20.5 9.2 56.2 0.0 0.6 4.4 10.2 5.6 9P0533AM1 9P0533AM1 195.9 21.5 9.1 55.0 0.6 1.3 4.0 9.9 5.4

TABLE 2-8 Comparative Data for 213US01094 + VTU, 213US01160 + VTU, and 213UT01267 + VTU, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213US01094 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML9 203.7 18.6 11.0 52.7 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.0 5.8 213US01160 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM70 198.7 18.7 10.6 51.9 2.5 0.0 3.5 9.1 4.9 213UT01267 + VTU BB208RMQKB × NL6 199.6 19.4 10.3 52.6 2.0 0.3 3.9 9.6 5.8 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 198.1 20.4 9.7 54.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 8.9 5.8 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 197.5 20.4 9.7 54.1 0.5 0.7 3.4 8.9 5.9 212UC00890 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × ML9 191.0 20.4 9.4 53.4 0.8 1.0 3.4 9.2 6.0 211UA02203 + VTU MEF2526RMQKZ × HCL4029 189.7 20.4 9.3 56.0 0.1 −0.1 3.2 8.3 6.2 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 201.8 20.6 9.8 52.4 0.0 2.8 3.6 9.7 5.7 9P0533AM1 9P0533AM1 200.7 21.5 9.3 55.2 0.0 0.3 3.1 8.8 5.7

TABLE 2-9 Comparative Data for 213US01094 + VTU, 213US01152 + VTU, 214US01523 + VTU, and 214UV02565 + VTU, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 24 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213US01094 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × ML9 197.9 16.4 12.1 52.9 0.8 4.3 3.7 9.4 5.6 214UV02565 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × KL6 198.8 16.9 11.8 51.6 3.9 0.3 4.0 10.1 5.0 213US01152 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM69 192.9 17.4 11.1 52.2 2.9 2.1 4.1 10.0 4.9 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 195.3 18.6 10.5 52.8 1.0 4.8 4.2 10.5 4.9 214US01523 + VTU BB208 × MM53RMQKZ 205.0 19.6 10.5 53.2 3.1 4.4 4.0 10.0 5.4 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 196.3 19.7 10.0 54.4 2.4 0.8 3.7 9.9 5.4 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 200.7 19.8 10.1 54.5 0.5 1.2 3.5 9.2 5.3 213UA02356 + GSS A1601GJLHZ × A5105LFWMZ 198.2 20.5 9.7 55.1 0.1 −0.1 4.1 9.8 5.0 212UE02102 + GSS F0297RMQKZ × F1266LMSLZ 199.8 21.4 9.3 54.2 1.0 5.8 3.9 9.6 4.6

TABLE 2-10 Comparative Data for 213US01144 + VTU, and 214UV02564 + VTU, Hybrids Having BB208 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 58 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UV02564 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM68 196.1 16.3 12.0 52.2 1.6 0.2 3.5 9.4 4.3 213US01144 + VTU BB208RMQKZ × MM67 194.3 18.1 10.7 51.6 3.5 1.0 3.5 9.3 5.5 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 194.5 18.3 10.6 53.3 0.8 1.2 3.7 9.5 5.1 213UA02356 + GSS A1601GJLHZ × A5105LFWMZ 193.7 19.4 10.0 55.2 0.4 0.0 3.7 9.3 5.1 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 193.3 19.4 10.0 54.7 0.2 2.6 3.3 9.0 5.2 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 198.3 19.6 10.1 54.6 0.6 0.6 3.4 9.2 5.2 9P0533AM1 9P0533AM1 199.7 21.0 9.5 55.6 0.8 2.6 3.1 8.6 4.7 212UE02102 + GSS F0297RMQKZ × F1266LMSLZ 195.9 21.0 9.3 54.6 0.6 1.5 3.4 9.1 4.8

BB209

TABLE 3-1 Overall comparisons: First Year field trials, 5 reps Yld Hybrid Grain H2O Y/M SL % RL % TW Asp PlHt EHt BB59 × LH287BtCCR 208.4 23.0 9.2 0.0 6.8 56.8 7.3 280.0 100.0 BB209 × ML9 199.3 18.7 10.8 0.0 0.9 58.0 6.3 260.0 90.0 BB38 × ML9 191.2 20.1 9.6 0.0 0.4 58.4 7.1 260.0 110.0 BC110 × ML9 171.9 18.5 9.3 0.0 1.5 58.4 7.1 300.0 90.0

TABLE 3-2 Overall comparisons: Second Year field trials, 11 reps Yld Hybrid Grain H2O Y/M SL % RL % TW Asp PlHt EHt BB209 × MN7RMQKZ 191.3 19.9 10.3 0.7 0.2 51.7 6.2 277.4 94.5 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 186.5 19.8 10.1 0.2 1.1 51.9 6.5 259.1 94.5 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 181.7 22.0 8.9 0.2 5.4 50.9 7.1 274.3 91.4 P1018AM1 180.0 20.9 9.1 0.3 5.8 54.3 7.0 295.7 109.7 DKC57-50 176.8 19.2 9.7 0.0 0.0 56.9 5.8 274.3 85.3

TABLE 3-3 Overall comparisons; Third Year field trials, 24 reps Yld Hybrid Grain H2O Y/M SL % RL % TW Asp PlHt EHt A1555RMQKZ × BB209 216.1 22.7 10.0 0.4 2.4 51.8 6.3 298.7 121.9 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 212.2 21.8 10.0 0.0 1.2 51.9 6.8 280.4 112.8 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 210.9 20.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 51.9 6.0 283.5 112.8 P0832AMX 207.1 21.4 10.0 0.1 5.8 55.6 5.8 289.6 131.1 DKC57-75RIB 205.7 21.8 10.0 0.0 2.2 54.3 6.6 268.2 106.7 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 204.8 21.2 10.0 0.0 3.1 53.3 6.3 286.5 115.8 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 203.1 20.7 10.0 0.0 0.5 53.6 5.9 295.7 118.9 A3027RMQKZ × 202.6 21.3 10.0 0.6 0.2 54.1 6.2 301.8 121.9 A2959LMSLZ A3829RMQKZ × A6737Z 190.4 20.5 9.0 0.1 0.4 55.9 6.4 283.5 125.0

TABLE 3-4 Overall comparisons; Third Year field trials, 22 reps Yld Hybrid Grain H2O Y/M SL % RL % TW Asp PlHt EHt A7196GJLHZ × 235.4 24.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 54.4 7.0 277.4 109.7 T6053LFWMZ CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.6 23.3 10.0 0.0 0.5 53.1 6.7 301.8 97.5 BB209 × A1555RMQKZ 221.7 21.4 11.0 0.4 0.9 52.8 6.4 301.8 106.7 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 220.2 22.2 10.0 0.0 2.0 52.9 6.6 292.6 103.6 DKC62-97RIB 219.7 21.9 10.0 0.1 0.7 55.1 6.5 283.5 103.6 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 216.6 22.1 10.0 3.6 0.0 53.7 6.5 289.6 97.5 P1339AM1 214.9 22.8 10.0 2.0 2.1 55.1 6.3 317.0 118.9

BB210

TABLE 4-1 Comparative Data for 213UC00848 + VTU, a Hybrid Having BB210 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 186.1 19.7 9.5 53.8 0.0 1.5 3.2 9.4 6.4 9DKC62-97 DKC62-97 184.6 19.8 9.3 54.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.2 6.2 213UC00848 + VTU BB210 × A1555RMQKZ 192.1 20.4 9.4 53.1 0.6 0.6 3.1 9.5 6.1 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 186.6 20.5 9.1 53.6 0.8 0.9 3.4 9.5 6.4 9P1395AM1 P1395AM1 184.3 20.9 8.8 53.8 1.0 4.6 3.8 10.0 5.9

TABLE 4-2 Comparative Data for 213UC00848 + VTU, a Hybrid Having BB210 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 57 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC00848 + VTU BB210 × A1555RMQKZ 216.8 21.6 10.0 53.2 0.8 0.0 3.2 9.4 6.2 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 216.1 21.6 10.0 53.7 0.4 0.0 3.4 9.6 6.2 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 215.7 22.0 9.8 55.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 9.1 6.3 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 212.7 22.6 9.4 55.2 3.2 0.0 3.9 10.1 5.8 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 215.6 22.8 9.5 53.4 0.9 0.1 3.1 9.5 6.1

TABLE 4-3 Comparative Data for 213UC00848 + VTU, a Hybrid Having BB210 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 220.9 19.8 11.2 55.7 1.7 1.6 3.4 9.0 5.4 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 215.7 20.8 10.4 53.8 0.5 0.7 3.1 9.2 6.0 213UC00848 + VTU BB210 × A1555RMQKZ 220.4 20.9 10.5 53.2 1.6 3.5 3.4 9.3 5.6 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 207.7 20.9 9.9 56.2 0.6 0.4 3.8 9.6 5.6 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.7 22.6 9.9 53.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 9.2 6.1

BB211

TABLE 51 Comparative Data for 213UC00851, a Hybrid Having BB211 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 13 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC00851 BB211 × ML9 174.1 16.6 10.5 56.6 0.0 5.0 2.9 8.2 6.2 208UN01239 BB38 × ML9 173.6 17.9 9.7 55.4 0.1 2.3 2.7 7.9 6.3 9DKC57-50 DKC57-50 164.2 18.7 8.8 56.0 0.0 3.7 3.2 8.9 5.7 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 169.2 20.5 8.2 52.2 0.0 1.4 2.8 8.5 6.9 9P1018AM1 P1018AM1 165.2 20.5 8.0 54.2 0.0 14.4 3.4 9.3 6.4

TABLE 5-2 Comparative Data for 213UC00851 and 213UC01454, Hybrids Having BB211 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 24 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC01454 BB211 × MM53 205.8 19.1 10.8 52.6 0.8 0.2 4.2 10.0 5.6 213UC00851 BB211 × ML9 200.8 20.0 10.0 53.1 0.0 0.3 3.8 9.7 6.2 213UM02224 + GSS R2999RMQKB × T5842LMSLZ 198.5 20.2 9.8 54.4 0.6 0.1 3.6 9.1 5.9 9DKC53-56RIB 9DKC53-56RIB 199.3 20.9 9.5 54.7 0.0 0.0 4.1 9.4 6.3 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 194.4 21.0 9.3 52.9 0.0 1.5 3.8 9.1 5.7 9P0533AM1 9P0533AM1 202.2 21.5 9.4 55.3 0.1 0.7 3.5 9.1 5.3 211UA02203 + VTU MEF2526RMQKZ × HCL4029 191.1 21.7 8.8 55.0 0.0 0.5 3.5 9.1 5.6

TABLE 5-3 Comparative Data for 213UC00852 + VTU, a Hybrid Having BB211 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 60 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 199.0 19.6 10.2 53.5 1.2 2.2 3.9 10.1 5.5 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 199.6 20.1 9.9 54.3 0.8 0.5 3.6 9.4 5.9 213UA02359 + GSS A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 207.4 20.8 10.0 54.0 1.1 2.8 4.0 9.9 5.6 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 205.1 20.9 9.8 52.7 0.5 2.9 3.6 9.5 6.0 213UC00852 + VTU BB211 × A1555RMQKZ 204.6 21.1 9.7 52.8 1.5 1.0 3.8 9.9 5.8 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 200.4 21.8 9.2 55.1 0.7 11.3 3.8 9.7 5.8 212UA01994 + VTU T5056RMQKZ × T6540Z 206.8 22.0 9.4 54.7 1.3 5.0 3.9 9.5 5.7 214UA02497 + GSS T3997GJLHZ × T1540LFWMZ 202.0 22.8 8.9 53.8 0.6 8.8 4.0 9.8 6.2

BC146

TABLE 6-1 Comparative Data for 213UE00993, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 4 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 207UE00488 BB36 × MN7 197.8 21.6 9.2 55.4 0.6 2.9 5.5 208UC00653 BB59 × LH287BT1CCR1 192.7 22.0 8.8 55.0 0.3 23.8 5.2 213UE00993 BC146 × MN7 205.2 22.1 9.3 55.3 0.0 7.3 6.2 208UC00653 BB59 × LH287BT1CCR1 194.0 22.2 8.7 55.1 0.0 23.3 6.2 207UE00488 BB36 × MN7 201.9 22.5 9.0 54.6 0.0 1.5 5.5 208UC00645 BB38 × LH287BT1CCR1 215.1 22.7 9.5 55.2 0.3 13.1 6.0 208UC00645 BB38 × LH287BT1CCR1 188.1 23.3 8.1 55.5 0.0 22.2 6.0

TABLE 6-2 Comparative Data for 213UE00994, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 15 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 191.0 19.9 9.6 53.7 1.9 0.0 3.5 9.7 5.9 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 184.1 20.1 9.2 54.6 0.4 0.0 3.3 9.4 6.2 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 193.8 21.2 9.1 53.5 1.2 2.2 3.4 9.5 6.4 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 190.6 21.6 8.8 54.3 0.4 0.0 3.3 9.5 6.6 212UC00811 BB36 × A1555RMQKZ 194.1 21.7 8.9 52.9 1.1 1.5 3.4 9.4 6.5 213UE00994 BC146 × A1555RMQKZ 197.3 22.0 9.0 54.2 1.4 0.3 3.6 9.7 6.6

TABLE 6-3 Comparative Data for 213UE00995, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 14 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UC01094 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 179.7 19.1 9.4 54.3 0.6 0.0 3.4 9.1 5.4 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 182.9 20.7 8.8 52.8 0.5 0.3 3.8 9.5 6.4 213UE00995 BC146 × MN7RMQKZ 195.0 20.8 9.4 52.3 2.5 0.0 3.8 9.5 6.0 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 191.7 20.9 9.2 54.5 1.3 0.6 3.5 9.6 5.9

TABLE 6-4 Comparative Data for 213UE00995, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UE00995 BC146 × MN7RMQKZ 212.2 20.2 10.5 52.0 1.3 0.4 3.4 9.9 6.1 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 217.1 21.8 9.9 54.9 0.2 0.0 3.6 9.6 6.7 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 224.7 22.2 10.1 52.6 0.0 0.0 3.5 9.9 6.8 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 211.7 22.3 9.5 53.2 1.9 0.1 3.4 9.7 6.5 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 220.4 23.3 9.5 53.3 0.0 0.1 3.4 10.0 6.6 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 223.1 23.7 9.4 54.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 8.9 6.5

TABLE 6-5 Comparative Data for 213UE00995, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UE00995 BC146 × MN7RMQKZ 220.8 20.4 10.8 52.3 1.4 0.0 3.7 9.7 6.1 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 219.7 21.9 10.0 55.1 0.1 0.7 3.4 9.3 6.5 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 216.6 22.1 9.8 53.7 3.6 0.0 3.2 9.5 6.5 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 220.2 22.2 9.9 52.9 0.0 2.0 3.4 9.6 6.6 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 214.9 22.8 9.4 55.1 2.0 2.1 3.9 10.4 6.3 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.6 23.3 9.6 53.1 0.0 0.5 3.2 9.9 6.7 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 235.4 24.0 9.8 54.4 0.0 0.0 3.6 9.1 7.0

TABLE 6-6 Comparative Data for 213UE02417, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 14 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 217.7 20.2 10.8 53.5 0.0 1.1 3.6 9.7 5.7 211UC01094 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 207.4 20.4 10.2 52.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 9.8 5.9 213UE02417 BC146 × MM53 215.6 20.6 10.4 52.8 0.5 2.0 3.9 9.5 5.9 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 200.6 21.6 9.3 53.1 0.0 2.6 4.0 9.1 6.1 213UA02359 A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 206.7 22.2 9.3 54.1 0.0 0.7 3.8 9.2 6.2 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 216.2 23.1 9.4 52.4 0.0 0.4 3.3 9.0 6.4

TABLE 6-7 Comparative Data for 213UE00994 and 213UE00995, Hybrids Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 11 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UE00995 BC146 × MN7RMQKZ 211.7 18.8 11.2 52.3 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.7 5.8 211UV00423 BB36 × MN7RMQKZ 195.9 18.9 10.4 51.5 0.0 0.0 3.1 10.0 6.3 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 201.2 19.9 10.1 53.7 0.3 0.0 3.4 9.3 5.8 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 206.3 20.8 9.9 52.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 10.2 6.4 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 211.3 20.9 10.1 54.6 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.7 6.8 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 212.6 21.5 9.9 53.3 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.4 6.7 213UE00994 BC146 × A1555RMQKZ 212.4 21.5 9.9 53.7 0.0 0.0 3.6 10.0 6.3 212UC00811 BB36 × A1555RMQKZ 211.4 22.1 9.6 52.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.4 6.2 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 205.7 22.1 9.3 55.2 1.1 0.0 3.9 10.4 6.0 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 204.8 22.6 9.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.6 6.8

TABLE 6-8 Comparative Data for 213UE02422, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 9 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 213.0 20.4 10.5 54.2 0.0 5.4 3.4 9.8 5.6 213UE02422 BC146 × MN26 216.8 20.8 10.4 55.6 0.0 0.5 3.4 9.8 6.3 9DKC62-97 9DKC62-97 216.6 21.5 10.1 55.7 0.0 0.9 3.4 9.7 6.2 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 217.9 21.7 10.1 53.0 0.0 5.4 3.0 9.5 6.0 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 224.7 22.0 10.2 53.6 0.0 7.3 3.0 9.8 6.8 212UC00811 BB36 × A1555RMQKZ 216.1 22.4 9.7 53.3 0.2 11.0 2.8 9.8 6.2 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 226.8 23.0 9.9 55.7 0.0 1.1 3.4 9.4 6.3 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 216.1 23.5 9.2 53.2 0.0 5.9 3.0 9.7 6.4

TABLE 6-9 Comparative Data for 213UE00994, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 17 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UA02497 T3997GJLHZ × T1540LFWMZ 205.4 19.7 10.4 56.2 0.5 0.0 3.9 9.8 6.1 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 229.7 19.9 11.6 55.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.3 6.3 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 230.1 19.9 11.6 54.1 3.6 0.0 3.5 9.4 6.2 213UE00994 BC146 × A1555RMQKZ 223.3 20.1 11.1 54.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.5 6.3 9P1498HR 9P1498HR 214.2 20.5 10.4 56.6 0.0 0.0 3.8 9.9 6.0 213UC01433 BB36GJLHZ × A1555LFWMZ 215.1 20.7 10.4 54.1 2.7 0.0 3.4 9.7 6.3 213UA02371 F7316RMQKZ × F1266Z 225.1 20.7 10.9 55.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 9.0 6.2 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 222.5 21.5 10.3 55.7 1.3 1.9 3.5 9.0 5.7 9P1690HR 9P1690HR 224.2 22.2 10.1 55.9 5.8 0.0 3.8 10.0 6.1

TABLE 6-10 Comparative Data for 213UE00994, a Hybrid Having BC146 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 220.9 19.8 11.2 55.7 1.7 1.6 3.4 9.0 5.4 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 215.7 20.8 10.4 53.8 0.5 0.7 3.1 9.2 6.0 213UE00994 BC146 × A1555RMQKZ 220.9 20.8 10.6 53.4 0.9 2.1 3.3 9.3 5.8 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 207.7 20.9 9.9 56.2 0.6 0.4 3.8 9.6 5.6 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 222.4 21.1 10.5 53.1 2.2 2.0 3.3 9.3 6.1 213UA02371 F7316RMQKZ × F1266Z 229.3 21.3 10.8 55.1 0.3 1.1 3.6 9.0 6.1 213UC01433 BB36GJLHZ × A1555LFWMZ 217.1 22.1 9.8 52.8 1.3 1.3 3.3 9.2 6.1 213UA02677 F2608RMQKZ × T9551LMSLZ 219.2 22.2 9.9 55.7 0.4 1.1 3.4 9.5 6.1 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.7 22.6 9.9 53.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 9.2 6.1 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 230.6 22.9 10.1 55.1 0.4 0.5 3.3 8.6 6.4

BC147

TABLE 7-1 Comparative Data for 213UE03466, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 4 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 208UC00653 BB59 × LH287BT1CCR1 181.9 22.7 8.0 57.7 0.0 9.1 6.1 208UC00653 BB59 × LH287BT1CCR1 193.9 23.3 8.3 57.2 0.0 4.6 6.6 213UE03466 BC147 × MN7 210.6 24.0 8.8 56.6 0.1 0.6 6.2 207UE00488 BB36 × MN7 198.7 24.3 8.2 56.7 0.0 3.7 5.8 208UC00645 BB38 × LH287BT1CCR1 203.9 24.6 8.3 56.9 0.0 3.7 7.3 207UE00488 BB36 × MN7 186.9 24.6 7.6 57.1 0.1 14.2 6.5 208UC00645 BB38 × LH287BT1CCR1 202.3 25.0 8.1 57.8 0.0 4.7 7.3

TABLE 7-2 Comparative Data for 213UE01007, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 15 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 191.0 19.9 9.6 53.7 1.9 0.0 3.5 9.7 5.9 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 184.1 20.1 9.2 54.6 0.4 0.0 3.3 9.4 6.2 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 193.8 21.2 9.1 53.5 1.2 2.2 3.4 9.5 6.4 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 190.6 21.6 8.8 54.3 0.4 0.0 3.3 9.5 6.6 212UC00811 BB36 × A1555RMQKZ 194.1 21.7 8.9 52.9 1.1 1.5 3.4 9.4 6.5 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 202.7 22.1 9.2 54.2 5.0 0.0 3.6 10.1 6.7

TABLE 7-3 Comparative Data for 213UE01008, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 15 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UC01094 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 183.5 18.6 9.9 54.4 1.1 0.0 3.6 9.0 5.1 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 193.4 20.7 9.4 54.4 1.1 1.2 3.5 9.4 6.4 213UE01008 BC147 × MN7RMQKZ 198.8 20.7 9.6 53.5 0.5 0.6 3.9 9.9 6.3 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 186.9 20.9 8.9 54.1 0.8 0.1 3.7 9.6 6.1

TABLE 7-4 Comparative Data for 213UE01008, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 24 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UC01094 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 210.9 20.0 10.5 51.9 0.0 0.0 3.7 9.3 6.0 211US00896 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 203.1 20.7 9.8 53.6 0.0 0.5 3.9 9.7 5.9 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 204.8 21.2 9.7 53.3 0.0 3.1 3.8 9.4 6.3 213UA02359 A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 202.6 21.3 9.5 54.1 0.6 0.2 4.0 9.9 6.2 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 207.1 21.4 9.7 55.6 0.1 5.8 4.3 9.5 5.8 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 205.7 21.8 9.4 54.3 0.0 2.2 3.5 8.8 6.6 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 212.2 21.8 9.7 51.9 0.0 1.2 3.7 9.2 6.8 213UE01008 BC147 × MN7RMQKZ 215.1 23.4 9.2 50.9 0.0 0.9 4.1 10.1 6.7

TABLE 7-5 Comparative Data for 213UE01007 and 213UE01008, Hybrids Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 217.8 21.5 10.1 52.7 2.7 1.1 3.8 9.9 6.1 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 217.8 21.6 10.1 55.2 1.2 0.0 3.5 9.4 6.4 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 220.5 21.6 10.2 53.7 0.5 0.2 3.4 9.8 6.2 213UE01008 BC147 × MN7RMQKZ 219.2 21.9 10.0 51.8 1.5 0.0 3.7 9.9 6.4 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 219.8 22.7 9.7 53.0 2.6 0.7 3.5 10.0 6.7 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 214.3 22.9 9.4 55.3 1.6 0.1 3.8 10.1 6.3 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 216.0 23.5 9.2 52.9 1.6 0.3 3.4 9.9 6.7 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 231.4 23.6 9.8 54.5 0.3 0.0 4.0 9.1 6.8

TABLE 7-6 Comparative Data for 213UE01008, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UE01008 BC147 × MN7RMQKZ 217.9 21.3 10.2 51.6 4.0 0.2 3.5 10.0 6.6 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 217.1 21.8 9.9 54.9 0.2 0.0 3.6 9.6 6.7 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 224.7 22.2 10.1 52.6 0.0 0.0 3.5 9.9 6.8 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 211.7 22.3 9.5 53.2 1.9 0.1 3.4 9.7 6.5 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 220.4 23.3 9.5 53.3 0.0 0.1 3.4 10.0 6.6 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 223.1 23.7 9.4 54.6 0.0 0.0 3.3 8.9 6.5

TABLE 7-7 Comparative Data for 213UE01007, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 219.7 21.9 10.0 55.1 0.1 0.7 3.4 9.3 6.5 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 216.6 22.1 9.8 53.7 3.6 0.0 3.2 9.5 6.5 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 220.2 22.2 9.9 52.9 0.0 2.0 3.4 9.6 6.6 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 214.9 22.8 9.4 55.1 2.0 2.1 3.9 10.4 6.3 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 226.9 23.2 9.8 52.7 0.0 6.7 3.5 10.2 6.9 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.6 23.3 9.6 53.1 0.0 0.5 3.2 9.9 6.7 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 235.4 24.0 9.8 54.4 0.0 0.0 3.6 9.1 7.0

TABLE 7-8 Comparative Data for 213UE02418, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 14 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 217.7 20.2 10.8 53.5 0.0 1.1 3.6 9.7 5.7 211UC01094 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 207.4 20.4 10.2 52.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 9.8 5.9 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 200.6 21.6 9.3 53.1 0.0 2.6 4.0 9.1 6.1 213UA02359 A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 206.7 22.2 9.3 54.1 0.0 0.7 3.8 9.2 6.2 213UE02418 BC147 × MM53 215.7 22.5 9.6 52.4 0.3 3.8 4.2 9.9 6.1 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 216.2 23.1 9.4 52.4 0.0 0.4 3.3 9.0 6.4

TABLE 7-9 Comparative Data for 213UE01007 and 213UE01008, Hybrids Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 11 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UV00423 BB36 × MN7RMQKZ 195.9 18.9 10.4 51.5 0.0 0.0 3.1 10.0 6.3 211UV00415 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 201.2 19.9 10.1 53.7 0.3 0.0 3.4 9.3 5.8 213UE01008 BC147 × MN7RMQKZ 205.4 20.4 10.1 51.7 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.8 6.4 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 206.3 20.8 9.9 52.7 0.0 0.0 3.3 10.2 6.4 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 211.3 20.9 10.1 54.6 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.7 6.8 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 212.6 21.5 9.9 53.3 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.4 6.7 212UC00811 BB36 × A1555RMQKZ 211.4 22.1 9.6 52.7 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.4 6.2 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 205.7 22.1 9.3 55.2 1.1 0.0 3.9 10.4 6.0 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 213.9 22.5 9.5 52.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 10.1 7.0 211UU01785 CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 204.8 22.6 9.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 3.1 9.6 6.8

TABLE 7-10 Comparative Data for 213UE01007, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 17 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UA02497 T3997GJLHZ × T1540LFWMZ 205.4 19.7 10.4 56.2 0.5 0.0 3.9 9.8 6.1 209UC00595 BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 229.7 19.9 11.6 55.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 9.3 6.3 212UJ00007 BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 230.1 19.9 11.6 54.1 3.6 0.0 3.5 9.4 6.2 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 230.3 20.5 11.2 54.7 0.0 0.0 3.5 9.6 6.5 9P1498HR 9P1498HR 214.2 20.5 10.4 56.6 0.0 0.0 3.8 9.9 6.0 213UC01433 BB36GJLHZ × A1555LFWMZ 215.1 20.7 10.4 54.1 2.7 0.0 3.4 9.7 6.3 213UA02371 F7316RMQKZ × F1266Z 225.1 20.7 10.9 55.9 0.0 0.0 3.8 9.0 6.2 213UU02222 A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 222.5 21.5 10.3 55.7 1.3 1.9 3.5 9.0 5.7 9P1690HR 9P1690HR 224.2 22.2 10.1 55.9 5.8 0.0 3.8 10.0 6.1

TABLE 7-11 Comparative Data for 214UN02889, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 200.4 19.4 10.3 54.0 0.6 7.7 3.6 10.5 5.4 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 198.5 20.3 9.8 54.6 0.3 10.1 3.2 9.1 6.3 214UN02889 BC147 × MM64 212.0 20.4 10.4 52.4 0.4 5.6 3.7 10.2 6.4 213UA02359 A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 206.0 20.4 10.1 54.4 0.4 1.6 3.8 10.1 5.9 209UC00596 BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 202.2 20.8 9.7 52.5 0.0 0.3 3.6 10.2 5.6 212UA01994 T5056RMQKZ × T6540Z 209.5 21.3 9.9 55.2 0.4 4.7 3.5 9.4 5.8 214UA02497 T3997GJLHZ × T1540LFWMZ 213.0 22.8 9.3 53.8 0.1 4.8 4.4 10.2 6.9 212UE01615 R2613RMQKZ × MN26 202.6 23.0 8.8 55.7 0.8 5.5 3.4 10.0 5.9

TABLE 7-12 Comparative Data for 214UE03317, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 25 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UU03346 F7316RPGJZ × F1266Z 220.9 19.8 11.1 55.5 0.8 2.1 3.3 8.6 5.2 214UE03317 BC147 × A1555RPGJZ 226.2 19.9 11.4 54.1 1.4 1.3 3.3 9.0 5.8 213UU03348 F2608RPGJZ × T9551Z 223.0 20.4 10.9 56.2 2.5 0.5 3.6 9.3 5.4 210UJ02224 BB36RR2 × A1555ZNYKZ 217.4 20.4 10.6 54.6 0.4 0.1 3.0 9.0 5.4 210UU00473 CB15 × LH287 211.4 20.8 10.2 54.5 0.6 1.1 2.9 9.0 5.9 214UA03018 A7196RPGJZ × T6053Z 224.1 20.9 10.7 56.8 1.5 0.0 3.5 8.7 5.6 9P1360AM 9P1360AM 219.8 21.0 10.5 56.7 0.8 6.0 3.2 9.0 5.4 212UU00615 CB15RHTTZ × A1555ZNYKZ 220.1 21.4 10.3 54.3 0.4 1.0 2.9 8.8 5.8 214UA03131 A7196RPGJZ × A9826Z 215.6 22.3 9.7 55.2 0.4 0.0 3.3 8.8 5.7 9DKC66-97RIB 9DKC66-97RIB 216.8 22.4 9.7 55.3 0.1 0.0 3.3 8.9 6.0 213UA02691 A7196RPGJZ × F1479Z 221.0 22.5 9.8 55.6 0.5 0.0 3.8 9.3 6.7 9P1690HR 9P1690HR 228.7 22.7 10.1 56.1 0.9 5.5 3.6 9.6 6.5

TABLE 7-13 Comparative Data for 213UE01007, a Hybrid Having BC147 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 57 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UU03346 F7316RPGJZ × F1266Z 219.8 20.4 10.8 55.7 0.8 0.0 3.3 8.6 5.6 213UU03348 F2608RPGJZ × T9551Z 220.3 21.0 10.5 55.7 1.0 2.2 3.5 9.0 5.5 9DKC64-69 9DKC64-69 212.3 21.2 10.0 55.9 1.7 1.7 3.6 8.8 5.2 213UE01007 BC147 × A1555RMQKZ 223.7 21.4 10.4 53.6 0.6 1.7 3.3 9.2 6.0 214UA03018 A7196RPGJZ × T6053Z 216.3 21.5 10.1 56.6 2.0 1.4 3.4 8.8 5.4 9P1360AM 9P1360AM 210.7 21.5 9.8 56.3 1.7 2.9 3.4 9.1 5.5 210UJ02224 BB36RR2 × A1555ZNYKZ 208.0 21.5 9.7 54.3 0.0 1.0 2.9 8.8 5.5 212UU00615 CB15RHTTZ × A1555ZNYKZ 218.0 21.7 10.0 54.3 1.8 1.0 3.3 9.1 5.4 9DKC66-97RIB 9DKC66-97RIB 216.5 22.7 9.5 54.8 1.0 0.0 3.3 9.1 5.8 9P1690HR 9P1690HR 223.3 22.9 9.7 55.2 3.1 1.8 3.7 9.7 6.2 214UA03131 A7196RPGJZ × A9826Z 216.2 23.2 9.3 54.7 1.0 0.1 3.4 9.1 5.7 213UA02691 A7196RPGJZ × F1479Z 207.2 23.2 8.9 55.0 0.9 1.3 3.6 9.4 6.4

CB21

TABLE 8-1 Comparative Data for 508UV07587, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 4 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 508UV07587 CB21/MN7 218.3 18.7 11.7 55.4 0.3 1.3 5.5 208UN01154 + NZR BB14BT1RR2/MN7 216.2 18.8 11.5 55.4 0.3 0.0 5.0 207US00957 BB38/MN7 210.0 19.4 10.8 55.9 −0.1 0.7 5.0

TABLE 8-2 Comparative Data for 211UV00440, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 21 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHt PlHt HA n 211UV00440 CB21/ML9 190.3 17.4 10.9 54.8 1.4 0.4 3.8 9.7 5.8 206UV00328 BB14/MM27 182.3 19.2 9.5 54.6 2.6 0.0 3.4 9.2 5.6 208UN01239 BB38/ML9 184.0 19.7 9.3 54.8 0.6 0.0 3.4 9.9 6.4 211US00002 + 603 BB59/LH287RR2-1 187.6 19.7 9.5 54.8 1.0 0.1 3.4 9.7 6.6 9DKC61-69 DKC61-69 189.0 20.0 9.4 55.0 2.2 1.9 4.0 10.1 5.9

TABLE 8-3 Comparative Data for 211UV00440, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 22 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHt PlHt HA n 211UV00440 CB21/ML9 187.3 18.7 10.0 56.6 0.7 4.5 3.4 8.8 5.4 208UN01239 BB38/ML9 178.3 18.7 9.5 57.7 1.0 1.4 3.0 8.9 5.6 9DKC57-50 DKC57-50 179.3 19.7 9.1 57.1 0.5 1.7 3.5 9.1 5.6 211US00002 + 603 BB59/LH287RR2-1 181.4 20.7 8.8 56.5 1.5 3.8 3.5 9.1 5.9 208UC00653 + YGC BB59/LH287BT1CCR1 185.6 20.8 8.9 55.9 2.7 3.9 3.5 9.3 6.0

TABLE 8-4 Comparative Data for 211UV01591 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 8 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 211UC01091 + 017 BC110/MN7RMQKZ 146.0 19.2 7.6 53.9 0.0 0.0 4.7 211UC01094 + 017 CB18/MN7RMQKZ 171.9 21.0 8.2 52.6 0.2 0.0 4.7 211UV01591 + VTU CB21/A1555RMQKZ 175.7 22.2 7.9 52.1 0.1 0.0 5.7 209UC00595 + VTU BB38/A1555RMQKZ 170.7 23.3 7.3 51.3 0.0 0.0 5.7

TABLE 8-5 Comparative Data for 211UV01591 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 5 field trials, 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UC01094 + 017 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 200.7 19.7 10.2 52.3 0.1 0.1 3.5 9.2 6.0 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 195.1 20.1 9.7 53.9 0.2 0.4 3.7 9.5 5.7 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 203.2 20.9 9.7 54.7 0.3 1.2 3.3 8.7 6.5 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 199.5 21.3 9.4 55.8 0.5 3.7 3.9 9.5 5.8 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 203.4 21.4 9.5 52.7 0.0 1.7 3.4 8.9 6.5 211UV01591 + VTU CB21/A1555RMQKZ 210.0 21.6 9.7 53.0 0.8 2.0 3.6 8.6 6.5 211UV00415 + 017 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 201.1 21.6 9.3 53.5 0.6 1.1 3.8 9.3 6.1

TABLE 8-6 Comparative Data for 211UV01591 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 5 field trials, 61 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 199.3 20.1 9.9 53.5 0.5 0.4 3.6 9.5 5.9 211UC01094 + 017 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 207.2 20.5 10.1 51.4 0.3 0.0 3.5 9.1 6.0 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 199.2 21.2 9.4 54.5 0.1 0.6 3.3 8.6 6.5 211UV00415 + 017 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 208.5 21.4 9.7 53.0 0.4 1.2 3.7 9.3 6.1 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 208.1 21.7 9.6 52.3 0.1 0.8 3.4 9.3 6.5 211UV01591 + VTU CB21/A1555RMQKZ 213.2 21.9 9.7 52.7 0.0 0.8 3.7 9.2 6.7

TABLE 8-7 Comparative Data for 211UV00440, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 6 field trials, 58 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UV00440 CB21 × ML9 200.2 17.4 11.8 52.8 0.8 4.8 3.7 9.1 5.5 212UC00914 + VTU RBO1RMQKZ × MM53 194.6 18.3 10.9 53.2 0.8 1.2 3.7 9.5 5.1 9DKC53-56RIB DKC53-56RIB 193.5 19.5 10.2 54.7 0.2 2.6 3.3 9.0 5.2 9P0533AM1 P0533AM1 199.9 21.0 9.7 55.6 0.8 2.6 3.1 8.6 4.7

TABLE 8-8 Comparative Data for 215UV00062, a Hybrid Having CB21 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 6 field trials, 60 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 215UV00062 CB21 × MM69 202.7 17.7 12.1 52.1 3 0.9 3.9 9.9 5.5 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 199 19.6 10.8 53.5 1.2 2.2 3.9 10.1 5.5 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 199.6 20.1 10.3 54.3 0.8 0.5 3.6 9.4 5.9 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 205.1 20.9 10.3 52.7 0.5 2.9 3.6 9.5 6 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 200.4 21.8 9.5 55.1 0.7 11.3 3.8 9.7 5.8

CB34

TABLE 2 Comparative Data for 213UC00864 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB34 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 210US02194 + VTU F4780RMQKZ × T5972Z 178.2 17.3 10.3 57.8 0.6 0.0 3.2 8.5 5.4 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 192.2 18.1 10.6 55.4 0.0 0.0 3.3 8.8 5.9 211UC01094 + 017 CB18 × MN7RMQKZ 191.4 18.7 10.2 54.5 0.4 0.0 3.1 8.2 5.3 211UV00415 + 017 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 197.6 19.6 10.1 53.5 0.3 0.0 3.3 8.7 6.0 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 183.3 20.7 8.9 52.3 0.4 0.2 2.7 8.3 6.2 213UC00864 + VTU CB34 × A1555RMQKZ 205.6 21.5 9.6 52.1 0.4 0.7 3.3 8.8 6.2

TABLE 3 Comparative Data for 213UC00864 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB34 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 57 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC00864 + VTU CB34 × A1555RMQKZ 218.5 21.2 10.3 53.0 1.6 0.2 3.7 10.0 6.3 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 216.1 21.6 10.0 53.7 0.4 0.0 3.4 9.6 6.2 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 217.4 21.8 10.0 52.8 1.5 0.2 3.1 9.5 6.4 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 215.7 22.0 9.8 55.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 9.1 6.3 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 212.7 22.6 9.4 55.2 3.2 0.0 3.9 10.1 5.8 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 215.6 22.8 9.5 53.4 0.9 0.1 3.1 9.5 6.1

TABLE 4 Comparative Data for 213UC00864 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB34 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 220.9 19.8 11.2 55.7 1.7 1.6 3.4 9.0 5.4 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 215.7 20.8 10.4 53.8 0.5 0.7 3.1 9.2 6.0 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 207.7 20.9 9.9 56.2 0.6 0.4 3.8 9.6 5.6 213UC00864 + VTU CB34 × A1555RMQKZ 224.0 21.0 10.7 53.2 1.9 3.2 3.7 9.8 6.2 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 222.4 21.1 10.5 53.1 2.2 2.0 3.3 9.3 6.1 213UA02677 + GSS F2608RMQKZ × T9551LMSLZ 219.2 22.2 9.9 55.7 0.4 1.1 3.4 9.5 6.1 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.7 22.6 9.9 53.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 9.2 6.1

CB39

TABLE 10-1 Comparative Data for 213UU00787 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB39 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: 60 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 199.0 19.6 10.2 53.5 1.2 2.2 3.9 10.1 5.5 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 199.6 20.1 9.9 54.3 0.8 0.5 3.6 9.4 5.9 213UA02359 + GSS 2201 × 8001 207.4 20.8 10.0 54.0 1.1 2.8 4.0 9.9 5.6 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × 7610 205.1 20.9 9.8 52.7 0.5 2.9 3.6 9.5 6.0 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 200.4 21.8 9.2 55.1 0.7 11.3 3.8 9.7 5.8 212UA01994 + VTU 2036 × 8028 206.8 22.0 9.4 54.7 1.3 5.0 3.9 9.5 5.7 213UU00787 + VTU CB39 × 7610 201.3 22.1 9.1 52.6 0.7 2.8 3.5 9.9 6.0 214UA02497 + GSS 2349 × 8097 202.0 22.8 8.9 53.8 0.6 8.8 4.0 9.8 6.2

TABLE 10-2 Comparative Data for 213UU00787 + VTU, a Hybrid Having CB39 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: 48 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 210UJ02225 + N34 BB59RR2 × 7610 201.5 19.9 10.1 53.6 0.0 1.9 6.3 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 207.5 20.1 10.3 54.3 0.7 2.2 5.9 213UA02370 + GSS 2332 × 8077 192.0 20.1 9.6 55.9 2.0 2.0 5.9 213UC00852 + VTU BB211 × 7610 203.9 20.8 9.8 53.7 0.1 2.1 6.1 211UV01591 + VTU CB21 × 7610 205.9 21.2 9.7 53.8 0.2 2.2 6.4 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × 7610 203.7 21.2 9.6 53.2 0.0 1.6 6.3 213UA02520 + GSS 2160 × 8013 188.8 21.4 8.8 55.7 0.1 2.0 6.2 212UC00810 + VTU BB202 × 7610 205.4 21.9 9.4 54.3 0.1 2.4 6.4 213UU00787 + VTU CB39 × 7610 206.9 22.1 9.4 53.2 0.1 2.3 6.5 214UA02497 + GSS 2349 × 8097 199.0 22.2 9.0 54.6 0.0 3.4 6.6

II15

TABLE 11-1 Comparative data for 509UM06823, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 7 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 203UK00780 + 603 HC50RR2-1/SGI901 176.0 21.4 8.2 54.9 0.9 0.4 5.4 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 202.4 23.1 8.8 53.9 1.8 0.6 6.4 509UM06823 AB7/II15 201.1 23.6 8.5 53.4 0.0 0.7 5.4 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2/HCL506 195.6 25.5 7.7 53.1 0.5 0.6 6.1 208UC01430 + 603 HCL105RR2/HCL531 204.6 27.2 7.5 52.4 0.0 0.0 6.7

TABLE 11-2 Comparative data for 509UM06823, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 15 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 509UM06823 AB7/II15 170.2 14.5 11.8 58.2 4.0 2.9 3.1 8.7 5.3 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1/HCL422 157.5 14.8 10.6 59.0 4.5 0.0 3.4 9.0 5.4 208UA01447 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL425BT1 164.7 15.5 10.6 59.1 1.3 0.0 2.9 7.6 4.9 9DKC43-27 DKC43-27 180.8 16.3 11.1 57.6 0.6 0.0 3.2 8.1 6.1 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 173.0 16.6 10.4 57.4 5.4 0.1 3.4 8.9 5.7 208UC01435 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL419BT1-2 185.9 17.2 10.8 57.2 2.5 0.0 3.5 9.0 6.4 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2/HCL506 180.6 17.3 10.4 56.7 4.6 0.4 3.7 8.7 6.7 210UM01241 + 603 HCL112RR2/HCL437 185.8 18.4 10.1 56.8 1.3 0.3 3.3 8.7 6.5

TABLE 11-3 Comparative data for 511UM07776, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 8 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 202UQ01053 + 603 HC37RR2-1/SGI918 127.3 18.8 6.8 55.9 3.8 0.4 3.0 7.9 5.1 210UK00575 + NZR LM3/IV2BT1RR2 98.6 19.5 5.1 56.1 1.9 1.8 2.8 7.2 4.9 9DKC30-20 DKC30-20 122.8 19.5 6.3 57.0 1.4 0.6 3.4 8.6 5.5 9P39D97 P39D97 137.4 19.6 7.0 58.2 3.2 19.6 3.6 7.8 4.6 208UA01447 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL425BT1 125.8 19.8 6.4 56.3 2.2 0.8 3.2 8.2 5.5 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1/HCL422 136.0 19.9 6.8 55.9 2.9 0.9 3.2 8.6 5.8 9DKC35-43 DKC35-43 134.8 20.2 6.7 55.8 1.1 0.2 3.6 8.5 5.8 210UJ01450 + 603 HC37RR2-1/SGI901 120.7 20.3 5.9 55.8 2.1 0.4 3.5 8.7 5.6 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 136.2 20.7 6.6 56.1 6.1 2.8 3.6 8.7 5.9 511UM07776 AB19/II15 135.7 22.6 6.0 52.8 4.2 19.1 3.4 9.0 4.5

TABLE 11-4 Comparative data for 509UM06823 and 511UM07776, Hybrids Having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 9 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 202UQ01053 + 603 HC37RR2-1/SGI918 122.2 18.2 6.7 56.9 5.6 0.1 3.1 7.8 4.9 9DKC35-43 DKC35-43 117.6 18.3 6.4 57.2 3.5 0.1 3.1 7.8 5.2 509UM06823 AB7/II15 138.8 18.3 7.6 54.8 7.2 1.2 2.9 8.3 5.1 208UA01447 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL425BT1 126.6 18.4 6.9 57.1 1.8 0.1 2.8 7.4 5.1 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1/HCL422 140.8 18.6 7.6 56.4 4.2 0.0 3.2 8.1 5.6 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 126.2 18.9 6.7 57.1 9.3 0.1 3.2 8.2 5.3 9P8906HR P8906HR 132.2 19.2 6.9 56.9 2.0 0.1 3.4 8.2 5.7 9DKC38-89 DKC38-89 147.5 19.8 7.4 56.5 0.3 0.0 3.0 8.3 5.9 208UC01435 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL419BT1-2 137.6 19.9 6.9 56.7 6.2 0.1 3.4 8.4 5.8 511UM07776 AB19/II15 142.4 20.1 7.1 54.9 1.4 12.3 3.3 8.6 5.0 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2/HCL506 143.9 21.2 6.8 55.5 9.1 1.7 3.3 8.0 5.6

TABLE 11-5 Comparative data for 212UM01817 + VTU, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 8 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1/HCL422 176.6 16.1 11.0 57.1 7.9 0.1 5.5 212UM01817 + VTU T0958RMQKZ/II15 196.3 16.3 12.0 56.5 5.8 2.3 5.6 207UM01825 + YGC HC50BT1CCR1/HCL422 183.5 16.9 10.9 57.0 3.8 0.1 6.6 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 182.2 17.6 10.4 57.8 3.8 1.0 6.3 212UM01651 + 603 R2999RHTTB/A3974Z 198.0 18.1 11.0 56.9 1.4 1.8 5.8 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB/A3974Z 198.4 18.1 10.9 56.7 0.4 0.1 5.5 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2/HCL506 201.7 18.6 10.9 56.8 4.2 0.1 6.6 208UC01435 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL419BT1-2 192.2 18.7 10.3 57.0 3.5 2.0 6.0

TABLE 11-6 Comparative data for 212UM01817 + VTU and 213UM02792 + N34, Hybrids Having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 5 field trials, 8 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UM01741 + N34 HC50RR2-2/F3121ZNYKZ 157.3 16.6 9.5 53.5 0.0 0.5 3.4 8.8 5.0 212UM01817 + VTU T0958RMQKZ/II15 176.7 18.9 9.3 53.3 0.9 2.4 3.3 8.7 6.0 211UA02124 + N34 HCL116RR2/F3632ZNYKZ 170.9 19.3 8.9 54.4 0.6 1.9 3.6 9.1 5.8 9P8906AM P8906AM 163.1 19.8 8.2 54.7 0.7 0.0 3.6 8.6 5.5 9DKC38-03RIB DKC38-03RIB 167.9 20.2 8.3 53.4 0.3 0.9 3.3 8.6 5.7 9DKC39-07RIB DKC39-07RIB 158.8 21.1 7.5 52.2 0.0 1.2 3.2 9.0 6.0 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 153.0 21.1 7.2 54.5 0.2 0.0 3.2 8.5 5.7 213UM02792 + N34 A8075RPGJZ/II15 171.8 22.9 7.5 51.8 0.0 3.3 3.1 8.9 5.8 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB/A3974Z 167.3 23.7 7.1 53.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 8.4 6.0

TABLE 11-7 Comparative data for 212UM01817 + VTU, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 5 field trials, 32 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UM01741 + N34 HC50RR2-2/F3121ZNYKZ 156.3 16.8 9.3 53.7 1.7 1.6 3.6 8.7 5.1 212UM01817 + VTU T0958RMQKZ/II15 167.5 18.4 9.1 54.4 3.0 3.6 3.4 8.9 5.4 211UA02124 + N34 HCL116RR2/F3632ZNYKZ 168.8 19.6 8.6 55.1 2.6 1.5 3.8 8.7 5.6 9P8906AM P8906AM 163.0 19.8 8.2 55.7 0.6 3.5 4.1 8.8 5.4 9DKC38-03RIB DKC38-03RIB 172.7 19.8 8.7 54.7 1.1 1.2 3.4 8.7 5.1 9DKC39-07RIB DKC39-07RIB 168.5 20.5 8.2 53.6 1.1 0.6 3.6 8.9 5.5 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 160.7 20.8 7.7 55.5 0.2 0.2 3.5 8.5 5.4 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB/A3974Z 170.4 22.4 7.6 54.0 0.4 0.3 3.5 8.4 5.6

TABLE 11-8 Comparative data for 213UM02792 + N34, a Hybrid having II15 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 6 field trials, 12 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UA02381 + N34 R4168RPGJZ × A2542Z 155.8 18.7 8.3 55.0 0.1 0.0 214UA03141 + N34 A6887RPGJZ × HCL4015 156.2 19.7 7.9 53.5 0.3 0.0 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 161.0 20.2 8.0 52.7 1.1 0.0 214UM02331 + N34 A0036RPGJZ × A1731Z 159.8 20.8 7.7 52.2 0.3 0.2 214UA03159 + N34 F5804RPGJZ × R9424Z 154.2 20.8 7.4 55.3 0.4 0.0 9P8906AM 9P8906AM 148.5 20.8 7.1 53.1 0.1 0.1 9DKC38-03RIB 9DKC38-03RIB 159.8 21.3 7.5 51.7 0.1 0.2 213UM02792 + N34 A8075RPGJZ × II15 164.3 21.4 7.7 50.8 0.3 0.1 214UA03157 + GSS F3030GJLHZ × T9245LFWMZ 166.0 22.0 7.5 51.2 0.0 0.0 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 158.2 22.4 7.1 51.4 0.0 0.0

II17

TABLE 12-1 Comparative Data for 214UQ01470, a Hybrid Having II17 as One Inbred Parent Overall Comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 8 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UQ01470 II17/AB7 173.1 14.4 12.0 59.4 4.0 0.0 NA NA 4.2 9DKC43-27 DKC43-27 187.4 15.4 12.2 58.8 1.9 0.2 NA NA 5.8 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 187.8 15.4 12.2 59.1 1.0 1.2 NA NA 6.0 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 193.4 15.5 12.5 58.8 1.0 0.0 NA NA 5.5 9DKC43-27 DKC43-27 182.4 15.7 11.6 58.4 1.1 0.0 NA NA 5.8 205UQ00792 + NZR HCL107RR2/HCL506BT1 182.9 16.1 11.4 57.9 0.8 1.0 NA NA 5.7 205UQ00792 + NZR HCL107RR2/HCL506BT1 179.3 16.6 10.8 58.1 1.6 1.2 NA NA 6.0

TABLE 12-2 Comparative Data for 214UQ01472, a Hybrid Having II17 as One Inbred Parent Overall Comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 10 reps Pedigree Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UQ01472 BC110/II17 173.8 15.9 10.9 54.0 2.3 0.0 NA NA 4.2 9DKC52-59 DKC52-59 170.6 17.1 10.0 54.0 8.2 0.1 NA NA 5.2 208UC01438 + YGC T2142RBDHZ/HCL519BT1 178.3 17.5 10.2 54.8 3.7 0.5 NA NA 5.2 207UV01124 + YGC HCL301CCR1/HCL516BT1 186.4 18.6 10.0 54.7 10.4 1.1 NA NA 4.4 9P0463XR P0463 180.5 19.3 9.4 55.1 2.3 7.9 NA NA 5.6

TABLE 12-3 Comparative Data for 214UQ01474, a Hybrid Having II17 as One Inbred Parent Overall Comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 13 reps Pedigree Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC43-27 DKC43-27 193.4 16.2 11.9 60.2 0.0 0.0 40.5 94.8 5.8 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2/HCL419 189.2 16.3 11.6 61.4 0.3 0.0 48.9 105.5 6.1 9DKC43-27 DKC43-27 191.8 16.6 11.6 59.8 0.0 0.0 43.3 97.3 6.5 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB/A3974Z 196.6 16.7 11.8 60.5 0.0 0.0 44.7 98.7 5.9 210UJ02213 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL419BT1 198.9 16.8 11.8 60.0 0.0 0.4 46.1 101.5 6.1 210UJ02213 + YGC HCL116CCR1/HCL419BT1 205.6 16.9 12.2 60.6 0.0 0.0 45.8 105.5 6.2 9P9519HR P9519HR 207.3 17.0 12.2 59.4 0.0 3.3 47.5 101.0 6.3 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB/A3974Z 198.5 17.3 11.5 58.4 0.0 0.2 47.2 95.9 6.1 9P9519HR P9519HR 205.9 17.5 11.8 58.1 0.0 3.2 48.4 103.2 6.2 214UQ01474 2107/II17 208.2 18.0 11.6 57.8 0.0 4.2 46.4 98.4 6.5

TABLE 12-4 Comparative Data for 214UQ01476 + 017, a Hybrid Having II17 as One Inbred Parent Overall Comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 17 reps Pedigree Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UA01962 + VTU A8075RMQKZ/R7440Z 193.5 19.0 10.2 56.3 0.0 0.0 41.3 108.3 5.2 213UM02223 + VTU R2999RMQKB/HCL4003 197.8 19.9 9.9 55.2 0.2 0.0 43.3 110.2 5.7 214UQ01476 + 017 BC110RBDHZ/II17 195.4 20.0 9.8 56.0 0.1 0.0 39.4 110.5 5.9 9P0062AMX P0062AMX 186.3 20.1 9.3 54.0 0.9 1.4 45.8 108.8 4.7 9DKC49-94RIB DKC49-94RIB 191.4 20.8 9.2 54.1 0.2 0.0 43.6 104.6 5.7 213UR02175 + GSS R2999GJLHZ/R3414LFWMZ 197.8 22.1 9.0 53.6 0.7 0.0 44.3 109.0 6.6

TABLE 12-5 Comparative Data for 214UQ03359 + N34, a Hybrid Having II17 as One Inbred Parent Overall Comparisons: Year 5 field trials Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UQ03359 + N34 R2999RPGJZ/II17 190.4 19.4 9.8 54.8 0.0 3.4 42.9 106.7 4.7 213UR02175 + GSS R2999GJLHZ/R3414LFWMZ 198.2 21.5 9.2 53.1 0.4 3.5 46.1 116.1 5.3 9P9917AMX 9P9917AMX 193.2 21.5 9.0 54.6 0.0 4.1 46.1 110.2 4.3 9DKC49-29RIB 9DKC49-29RIB 190.8 21.8 8.8 53.8 0.0 0.0 45.7 115.4 5.3

IM5

TABLE 13-1 Comparative Data for 211UM02780, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 6 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 211UM02780 AB7 × IM5 181.6 12.8 14.5 56.0 2.1 2.3 5.7 203UK00780 + 603 HC50RR2-1 × SGI901 148.2 12.9 11.7 57.9 1.9 0.0 5.3 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2 × HCL419 170.8 13.9 12.6 57.5 0.9 0.3 5.7 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2 × HCL506 187.7 15.0 13.1 56.3 1.4 1.0 6.3 210UM01241 + 603 HCL112RR2 × HCL437 196.2 16.0 12.7 56.6 0.7 0.0 6.8

TABLE 13-2 Comparative Data for 211UM02783, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 11 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 211UM02783 AB19 × IM5 139.0 19.0 7.6 55.7 5.8 −0.1 3.3 8.3 5.3 202UQ01053 + 603 HC37RR2-1 × SGI918 121.7 19.1 6.6 57.1 5.2 0.0 3.1 7.8 4.8 208UA01447 + YGC HCL116CCR1 × HCL425BT1 128.8 19.6 6.8 57.2 1.2 0.5 2.8 7.4 4.8 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2 × HCL419 132.2 19.7 6.9 57.2 8.4 0.3 3.2 8.2 5.1 9DKC35-43 9DKC35-43 123.3 19.8 6.6 56.7 3.1 0.0 3.1 7.8 5.1 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1 × HCL422 138.7 20.2 7.3 56.4 4.0 0.5 3.2 8.1 5.2 208UC01435 + YGC HCL116CCR1 × HCL419BT1-2 136.5 20.7 6.8 56.8 5.6 0.0 3.4 8.4 5.4 210UM00618 + G11 AB14 × NP2623GTCBLL 138.0 20.9 6.8 56.3 6.4 0.4 3.2 7.9 4.7 9P8906HR 9P8906HR 134.5 21.1 6.8 56.9 1.8 0.0 3.4 8.2 5.2 9DKC38-89 9DKC38-89 149.7 21.2 7.4 55.8 0.4 −0.2 3.0 8.3 5.5 206UM01239 + 603 HCL107RR2 × HCL506 143.9 22.2 6.8 55.5 8.2 1.3 3.3 8.0 5.3

TABLE 13-3 Comparative Data for 211UM02783, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 17 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 210UK00575 + NZR IV2BT1RR2 × LM3 138.9 16.5 8.6 57.3 3.5 4.6 3.1 7.6 4.8 212UM01721 + N34 A9587RHTTZ × A2268ZNYKZ 168.0 17.1 10.1 57.3 1.2 0.4 3.5 8.1 6.3 9DKC30-20 9DKC30-20 158.7 17.1 9.5 55.9 3.2 1.9 3.7 8.2 5.0 210UA02058 + YGC R5927RBDHZ × A3498ZKDDZ 157.8 17.4 9.4 57.1 3.0 1.6 3.9 8.0 5.1 212UM01650 + N34 HCL116RR2 × F7298ZNYKZ 181.5 17.5 10.8 56.4 2.6 0.1 3.4 8.3 5.3 209UK01912 + YGC R5927RBDHZ × F3745ZKDDZ 152.3 17.5 9.1 57.6 3.8 0.1 3.3 8.0 5.2 212UK01584 + N34 SGI044RHTTZ × SGI045ZNYKZ 149.8 17.5 8.8 56.8 1.4 0.2 3.9 8.1 6.6 9P39D97 9P39D97 153.0 17.9 8.9 56.5 1.0 8.6 3.8 8.0 5.1 211UM02783 AB19 × IM5 177.6 19.5 9.7 54.0 1.9 0.3 3.4 8.2 6.5

TABLE 13-4 Comparative Data for 212UM01826 + VTU, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 12 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 210UK00855 + 603 IV2RR2 × LM3 142.2 15.6 9.2 60.6 4.3 11.5 4.4 207UM01824 + 603 HC50RR2-1 × HCL422 170.7 15.9 10.8 58.6 1.9 2.2 5.3 213UM00001 + 603 SGI044RHTTZ × SGI045 164.9 16.1 10.5 59.4 1.1 0.7 6.1 212UM01650 + N34 HCL116RR2 × F7298ZNYKZ 166.8 16.2 10.4 58.6 1.6 1.4 5.2 210UA02058 + YGC R5927RBDHZ × A3498ZKDDZ 165.8 16.2 10.4 59.3 1.9 0.0 5.3 212UM01826 + VTU IM5 × 2371 184.9 16.5 11.5 58.3 7.1 0.0 5.3 207UM01825 + YGC HC50BT1CCR1 × HCL422 182.9 16.7 11.1 58.2 0.8 1.8 6.0 209UM00819 + 603 HCL116RR2 × HCL419 181.1 17.2 10.7 57.9 3.1 1.1 5.3 212UM01651 + 603 R2999RHTTB × A3974Z 204.3 17.3 12.0 56.7 0.3 0.0 5.3 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 194.4 17.3 11.4 57.7 0.6 0.0 5.4

TABLE 13-5 Comparative Data for 212UM01827 + VTU, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 12 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 207UM01825 + YGC HC50BT1CCR1 × HCL422 174.2 16.0 11.0 60.8 0.0 0.2 5.5 212UM01827 + VTU 2107 × IM5 197.7 16.9 11.8 59.1 0.1 0.0 6.8 212UM01723 + VTU A8668RMQKZ × T0813Z 179.3 17.3 10.7 59.3 0.1 2.0 5.5 210UR01118 + VTU HCL112CCR1 × A5338ZNYKZ 188.5 17.8 10.9 59.6 0.0 0.0 6.0 208UC01435 + YGC HCL116CCR1 × HCL419BT1-2 195.4 17.9 11.3 59.1 0.0 −0.3 6.1 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 188.1 18.0 10.7 59.1 0.0 0.0 5.7 210UA02079 + YGC R2999RBDHZ × HCL4003BT1 202.1 19.1 10.9 57.9 0.0 0.2 6.3

TABLE 13-6 Comparative Data for 212UM01826 + VTU and 212UM01827 + VTU, Hybrids Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 17 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UM01826 + VTU IM5 × 2371 166.0 17.0 9.9 53.9 5.0 0.7 3.4 8.6 5.9 212UM01741 + N34 HC50RR2-2 × F3121ZNYKZ 163.4 17.3 9.5 54.9 1.0 1.3 3.3 8.6 5.1 9P8906AM 9P8906AM 168.9 19.5 8.7 55.6 1.1 1.0 3.9 9.1 5.7 9DKC38-03RIB 9DKC38-03RIB 174.9 19.8 9.0 54.4 2.1 0.6 3.5 8.7 5.5 212UM01723 + VTU A8668RMQKZ × T0813Z 168.3 19.8 8.6 54.0 0.7 1.3 3.5 8.9 5.6 9DKC39-07RIB 9DKC39-07RIB 171.9 20.2 8.6 53.6 0.7 1.0 3.5 9.1 5.8 212UM01827 + VTU 2107 × IM5 170.2 20.7 8.5 53.2 4.3 0.8 3.4 8.7 6.3 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 160.5 20.7 7.9 55.5 0.3 0.2 3.2 8.7 5.2 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 174.1 22.5 7.9 53.8 3.6 −0.1 3.5 8.5 5.6

TABLE 13-7 Comparative Data for 212UM01822, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 18 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UM01741 + N34 HC50RR2-2 × F3121ZNYKZ 165.0 16.8 9.8 54.9 2.3 1.5 3.5 8.9 5.1 212UM01822 AB14 × IM5 172.4 18.3 9.5 55.6 2.7 0.7 3.1 8.4 5.1 212UM01723 + VTU A8668RMQKZ × T0813Z 170.6 18.9 9.1 54.5 1.4 0.5 3.5 8.9 5.8 9DKC38-03RIB 9DKC38-03RIB 173.4 19.2 9.2 54.7 0.9 0.7 3.7 8.9 5.2 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 166.0 20.8 8.1 55.8 0.7 0.0 3.6 8.9 5.5 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 168.2 22.0 7.7 54.1 0.3 0.2 3.5 8.6 5.4

TABLE 13-8 Comparative Data for 212UM01826 + VTU, a Hybrid Having IM5 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 4 field trials, 16 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 212UM01741 + N34 HC50RR2-2 × F3121ZNYKZ 156.3 16.8 9.3 53.7 1.7 1.6 3.6 8.7 5.1 212UM01826 + VTU IM5 × 2371 166.8 17.6 9.7 53.9 2.5 2.7 3.4 8.6 5.8 212UM01723 + VTU A8668RMQKZ × T0813Z 165.6 19.2 8.8 54.3 0.8 1.7 3.5 8.7 5.3 9DKC38-03RIB 9DKC38-03RIB 172.7 19.8 8.9 54.7 1.1 1.2 3.4 8.7 5.1 9P8906AM 9P8906AM 163.0 19.8 8.3 55.7 0.6 3.5 4.1 8.8 5.4 9DKC39-07RIB 9DKC39-07RIB 168.5 20.5 8.4 53.6 1.1 0.6 3.6 8.9 5.5 213UM02227 + N34 A7202RPGJZ × A4695Z 160.7 20.8 7.8 55.5 0.2 0.2 3.5 8.5 5.4 212UC00824 + VTU R2999RMQKB × A3974Z 170.4 22.4 7.8 54.0 0.4 0.3 3.5 8.4 5.6

LK1

TABLE 14-1 Comparative Data for 213US00930 + VTU, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 1 field trials, 12 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 212UA01960 + VTU A7196RMQKZ × T6053Z 166.4 19.7 8.4 55.9 1.9 0.0 5.5 211UV00415 + 017 BB46 × MM27RMQKZ 172.3 19.8 8.7 53.7 0.0 0.0 5.8 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 169.6 19.8 8.6 53.2 0.0 0.0 6.4 213US00930 + VTU A7196RMQKZ × LK1 181.2 20.5 8.8 53.2 3.6 0.0 5.2 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 166.6 20.8 8.0 52.2 0.0 0.0 6.7 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 177.3 21.9 8.1 52.3 0.1 2.4 6.7 9DKC66-96 9DKC66-96 173.5 22.4 7.7 53.9 0.8 0.4 6.1

TABLE 14-2 Comparative Data for 213UC01710 + 603, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 6 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC01710 + 603 CC8RHTTZ × LK1 204.2 20.1 10.2 54.5 1.4 0.0 3.8 10.0 5.5 9P1498HR 9P1498HR 212.2 21.0 10.1 55.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 10.3 5.3 9DKC66-96 9DKC66-96 209.9 21.5 9.8 54.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 9.4 5.5

TABLE 14-3 Comparative Data for 213UC01711 + 603, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 11 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213UC01711 + 603 CB13RHTTZ × LK1 199.3 19.9 10.0 55.2 0.0 0.0 3.9 11.0 5.5 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 200.8 20.1 10.0 53.7 0.6 0.0 3.6 10.7 5.7 9P1498HR 9P1498HR 209.0 20.4 10.2 56.0 0.4 0.0 3.7 10.5 5.6 210UJ02224 + N34 BB36RR2 × A1555ZNYKZ 194.3 20.8 9.3 54.2 0.1 0.0 3.6 10.2 5.3 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 194.8 20.9 9.3 54.1 0.0 0.0 3.4 10.7 5.0 9DKC66-96 9DK066-96 199.6 21.6 9.2 54.9 0.0 0.0 3.9 10.3 5.5 207UC01707 + YGC CC1 × LH287BT1CCR1 193.1 22.1 8.7 53.4 1.0 0.0 3.0 10.3 5.5

TABLE 14-4 Comparative Data for 213US01135 + VTU, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 2 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213US01135 + VTU BB36RMQKZ × LK1 220.0 20.6 10.7 54.0 1.7 0.0 3.7 10.3 6.3 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 218.4 21.5 10.2 52.8 2.6 1.1 3.8 9.9 6.2 9DKC62-97RIB 9DKC62-97RIB 217.3 21.5 10.1 55.3 1.2 0.0 3.5 9.4 6.4 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 220.9 21.6 10.2 53.7 0.5 0.2 3.4 9.8 6.2 9P1339AM1 9P1339AM1 214.5 22.8 9.4 55.2 1.5 0.1 3.8 10.1 6.3 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 216.3 23.5 9.2 52.9 1.6 0.3 3.4 9.9 6.8 213UU02222 + GSS A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 230.9 23.6 9.8 54.5 0.2 0.0 4.0 9.1 6.8

TABLE 14-5 Comparative Data for 214US01543 + VTU, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 23 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214US01543 + VTU MEF2526RMQKZ × LK1 205.2 20.3 10.1 53.9 0.6 0.3 4.0 9.8 5.8 211US00896 + 017 BB38RMQKZ × MM53 198.2 20.5 9.7 53.1 1.0 10.6 3.9 9.7 5.4 209UC00596 + VTU BB59 × A1555RMQKZ 202.6 21.2 9.6 52.4 0.0 1.7 3.6 9.6 5.7 9DKC57-75RIB 9DKC57-75RIB 199.2 21.3 9.4 53.9 1.3 1.7 3.6 9.1 5.5 213UA02359 + GSS A3027RMQKZ × A2959LMSLZ 206.1 21.7 9.5 53.7 0.5 2.0 4.0 9.5 5.6 9P0832AMX 9P0832AMX 202.4 22.8 8.9 54.6 0.1 16.4 3.8 9.8 5.6

TABLE 14-6 Comparative Data for 214UV02540, 214UV02541, and 214UV02542, Hybrids Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 24 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 214UV02540 BB85 × LK1 214.4 17.9 12.0 53.8 7.3 0.5 3.7 10.5 4.7 214UV02541 CB20 × LK1 217.6 19.1 11.4 54.0 4.6 0.0 4.3 10.2 5.4 214UV02542 CB21 × LK1 210.5 19.1 11.0 54.2 2.3 0.2 3.8 10.2 5.4 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 223.5 19.4 11.5 56.1 1.3 0.2 3.9 9.7 5.3 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 203.4 19.4 10.5 56.8 4.8 1.4 4.1 10.0 5.0 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 223.2 20.9 10.7 53.5 1.2 0.2 3.7 9.9 5.9 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 224.7 21.2 10.6 53.6 3.3 2.9 3.8 9.9 6.0 213UU02222 + GSS A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 234.9 22.8 10.3 55.3 0.1 0.0 3.6 9.4 6.6 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 225.1 22.9 9.8 53.5 1.8 0.7 3.1 9.6 6.0

TABLE 14-7 Comparative Data for 213US01135 + VTU, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 213US01135 + VTU BB36RMQKZ × LK1 217.1 19.1 11.4 54.2 2.1 0.8 3.5 9.8 5.7 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 220.8 19.7 11.2 55.7 1.7 1.6 3.4 9.0 5.4 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 215.7 20.8 10.4 53.8 0.5 0.7 3.1 9.2 6.0 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 207.7 20.9 9.9 56.2 0.6 0.4 3.8 9.6 5.5 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 222.4 21.1 10.5 53.1 2.2 2.0 3.3 9.3 6.1 213UC01433 + GSS BB36GJLHZ × A1555LFWMZ 217.1 22.1 9.8 52.8 1.3 1.3 3.3 9.2 6.1 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 223.7 22.6 9.9 53.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 9.2 6.1 213UU02222 + GSS A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 230.6 22.8 10.1 55.1 0.4 0.5 3.3 8.6 6.4

TABLE 14-8 Comparative Data for 213US01135 + VTU, a Hybrid Having LK1 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: Year 3 field trials, 85 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % 213US01135 + VTU BB36RMQKZ × LK1 223.0 17.1 13.0 56.4 2.3 0.2 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 219.4 17.9 12.3 59.1 2.2 0.5 213UA02390 + GSS T3997GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 231.1 18.5 12.5 57.1 0.4 0.1 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × A1555RMQKZ 228.9 18.6 12.3 55.6 0.8 0.1 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × A1555RMQKZ 228.0 18.8 12.1 54.4 0.5 0.4 213UC01433 + GSS BB36GJLHZ × A1555LFWMZ 220.0 18.9 11.6 54.7 0.9 0.5 213UU02222 + GSS A7196GJLHZ × T6053LFWMZ 239.5 19.0 12.6 58.4 0.5 0.2 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × A1555RMQKZ 231.6 19.3 12.0 55.7 0.7 0.2

MM65

TABLE 15-1 Comparative Data for 212UU02866 + VTU, a Hybrid Having MM65 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: 64 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % EHT PLHT HA n 9DKC63-33RIB 9DKC63-33RIB 220.9 19.8 11.2 55.7 1.7 1.6 3.4 9.0 5.4 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × 7610 215.7 20.8 10.4 53.8 0.5 0.7 3.1 9.2 6.0 9P1221AMXT 9P1221AMXT 207.7 20.9 9.9 56.2 0.6 0.4 3.8 9.6 5.6 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × 7610 222.4 21.1 10.5 53.1 2.2 2.0 3.3 9.3 6.1 212UU02866 + VTU BB36 × MM65RMQKZ 217.2 21.1 10.3 54.3 1.3 3.1 3.3 9.4 5.8 213UA02371 + VTU 2361 × 8084 229.3 21.3 10.8 55.1 0.3 1.1 3.6 9.0 6.1 213UC01433 + GSS BB36GJLHZ × 7641 217.1 22.1 9.8 52.8 1.3 1.3 3.3 9.2 6.1 213UA02677 + GSS 2220 × 8030 219.2 22.2 9.9 55.7 0.4 1.1 3.4 9.5 6.1 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × 7610 223.7 22.6 9.9 53.4 2.0 2.7 2.9 9.2 6.1 213UU02222 + GSS 2195 × 8026 230.6 22.9 10.1 55.1 0.4 0.5 3.3 8.6 6.4

TABLE 15-2 Comparative Data for 212UU02866 + VTU, a Hybrid Having MM65 as One Inbred Parent Overall comparisons: 18 reps Genotype Pedigree YLD Mst % Y/M TWgt SL % RL % HA n 213UU01991 + VTU BB86RMQKZ × MM69 208.3 22.1 9.4 52.9 0.0 0.0 5.7 213US01135 + VTU BB36RMQKZ × LK1 217.7 22.4 9.7 52.7 0.0 0.0 6.0 211UC01200 + VTU 2033 × ML12 222.0 23.1 9.6 54.1 0.0 0.0 5.6 213UC00848 + VTU BB210 × 7610 220.7 23.5 9.4 52.6 0.0 0.0 5.8 213UC00864 + VTU CB34 × 7610 232.6 23.7 9.8 52.5 0.0 0.0 5.9 213UC01452 + VTU BB209 × 7610 220.5 23.7 9.3 52.8 0.0 −0.1 5.6 209UC00595 + VTU BB38 × 7610 224.9 24.0 9.4 53.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 213UE00994 + VTU BC146 × 7610 217.6 24.0 9.1 52.9 0.0 0.1 6.0 213UU03346 + N34 2361 × 8084 213.9 24.0 8.9 53.9 0.1 0.1 5.8 212UU02866 + VTU BB36 × MM65RMQKZ 225.1 24.1 9.3 53.2 0.0 3.7 5.5 213UC01433 + GSS BB36GJLHZ × 7641 218.2 24.7 8.8 52.5 0.0 0.0 6.1 211UU01785 + VTU CB15 × 7610 227.6 24.9 9.1 52.7 0.0 0.0 6.1 212UJ00007 + VTU BB87 × 7610 225.2 24.9 9.0 52.7 0.0 0.0 6.1 213UE01007 + VTU BC147 × 7610 226.1 25.0 9.0 52.5 0.0 0.1 6.2 210UJ02224 + N34 BB36RR2 × 7632 208.2 25.1 8.3 53.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 214UA03131 + N34 2196 × 7729 222.4 26.1 8.5 53.6 0.6 0.7 5.8 213UU02222 + GSS 2195 × 8026 226.4 27.0 8.4 53.7 0.1 0.0 6.5

The foregoing detailed description has been given for clearness of understanding only and no unnecessary limitations should be understood there from as modifications will be obvious to those skilled in the art.

While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials, similar or equivalent to those described herein, can be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are described herein. All publications, patents, and patent publications cited are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes.

The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention.

While the invention has been described in connection with specific embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is capable of further modifications and this application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention following, in general, the principles of the invention and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the invention pertains and as may be applied to the essential features hereinbefore set forth and as follows in the scope of the appended claims. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A seed of inbred corn line designated BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______.
 2. A corn plant, or a part thereof, produced by growing the seed of claim
 1. 3. A corn plant, or a part thereof, having all the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______.
 4. A tissue culture of cells produced from the plant of claim
 2. 5. A corn plant regenerated from the tissue culture of claim 4, wherein the regenerated plant has all the morphological and physiological characteristics of inbred line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______.
 6. A method for producing a hybrid corn seed wherein the method comprises crossing the plant of claim 2 with a different corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed.
 7. A hybrid corn seed produced by the method of claim
 6. 8. A hybrid corn plant, or part thereof, produced by growing the seed of claim
 7. 9. A method for producing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______, wherein the method comprises: a) planting a collection of seeds comprising seed of a hybrid, one of whose parents is inbred line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, said collection also comprising seed of said inbred; b) growing plants from said collection of seeds; c) identifying the plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as inbred parent plants; d) controlling pollination of said inbred parent plants in a manner which preserves the homozygosity of said inbred parent plant; and e) harvesting the resultant seed and thereby producing an inbred corn line having all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.
 10. The method of claim 9 wherein step (c) comprises identifying plants with decreased vigor compared to the other plants grown from the collection of seeds.
 11. A method for producing a corn plant that contains in its genetic material one or more transgenes, wherein the method comprises crossing the corn plant of claim 2 with either a second plant of another corn line which contains a transgene or a transformed corn plant of the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, so that the genetic material of the progeny plant that results from the cross contains the transgene(s) operably linked to a regulatory element and wherein the transgene is selected from the group consisting of male sterility, male fertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, and increased digestibility.
 12. A corn plant, or a part thereof, produced by the method of claim
 11. 13. The corn plant of claim 12, wherein the transgene confers resistance to an herbicide selected from the group consisting of imidazolinone, sulfonylurea, glyphosate, glufosinate, L-phosphinothricin, triazine and benzonitrile.
 14. The corn plant of claim 12, wherein the transgene encodes a Bacillus thuringiensis protein.
 15. The corn plant of claim 12, wherein the transgene confers disease resistance.
 16. The corn plant of claim 12, wherein the transgene confers water stress tolerance.
 17. The corn plant of claim 12, where in the transgene confers increased digestibility.
 18. A method for producing a hybrid corn seed wherein the method comprises crossing the plant of claim 12 with a different corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed.
 19. A method of producing a corn plant with increased waxy starch or increased amylose starch wherein the method comprises transforming the corn plant of claim 2 with a transgene that modifies waxy starch or amylose starch metabolism, thereby producing a corn plant with increased waxy starch or amylose starch metabolism.
 20. A corn plant produced by the method of claim
 19. 21. A method of introducing one or more desired'traits into inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 wherein the method comprises: a) crossing the inbred line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plants grown from the inbred line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seed, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______, with plants of another corn line that comprise one or more desired traits to produce progeny plants, wherein the one or more desired traits are selected from the group consisting of male sterility, male fertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, waxy starch, water stress tolerance, increased amylose starch and increased digestibility; b) selecting progeny plants that have the one or more desired traits to produce selected progeny plants; c) crossing the selected progeny plants with the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 plants to produce backcross progeny plants; d) selecting for backcross progeny plants that have the one or more desired traits and physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 listed in Table 1A to Table 1S to produce selected backcross progeny plants; and e) repeating steps (c) and (d) one or more times in succession to produce selected second or higher backcross progeny plants that comprise the desired one or more traits and all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5,LK1, and MM65 as listed in Table 1A to Table 1S.
 22. A corn plant produced by the method of claim 21, wherein the plant has the one or more desired traits and all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 as listed in Table 1A to Table 1S.
 23. A method for producing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seed, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______, wherein the method comprises crossing a first inbred parent corn plant with a second inbred parent corn plant and harvesting the resultant corn seed, wherein both said first and second inbred corn plant are the corn plant of claim
 2. 24. A method for producing inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65 seed, wherein a representative sample of seed of said line was deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-______, wherein the method comprises: a) planting the inbred corn seed of claim 1; b) growing a plant from said seed; c) controlling pollination in a manner that the pollen produced by the grown plant pollinates the ovules produced by the grown plant; and d) harvesting the resultant seed and thereby producing an inbred corn line having all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65.
 25. A method for producing a corn seed that contains in its genetic material one or more transgenes, wherein the method comprises crossing the corn plant of claim 2 with either a second plant of another corn line which contains one or more transgenes or a transformed corn plant of the inbred corn line BB208, BB209, BB210, BB211, BC146, BC147, CB21, CB34, CB39, II15, II17, IM5, LK1, and MM65, wherein the transgene(s) is operably linked to a regulatory element and wherein the transgene is selected from the group consisting of male sterility, male fertility, herbicide resistance, insect resistance, disease resistance, water stress tolerance, and increased digestibility; and harvesting the resultant seed.
 26. A corn seed, or a part thereof, produced by the method of claim
 25. 27. A method for producing a hybrid corn seed wherein the method comprises crossing the plant of claim 22 with a different corn plant and harvesting the resultant hybrid corn seed.
 28. A hybrid corn seed produced by the method of claim
 27. 29. A corn product produced using the inbred seed of claim 1 or produced using the inbred corn plant, or part thereof, of claim
 2. 30. The corn product of claim 30, wherein the corn product is selected from the group consisting of corn meal, corn flour, corn starch, corn syrup, corn sweetener and corn oil.
 31. A corn product produced using the hybrid seed of claim 7 or produced using the hybrid corn plant, or part thereof, of claim
 8. 32. The corn product of claim 32, wherein the corn product is selected from the group consisting of corn meal, corn flour, corn starch, corn syrup, corn sweetener and corn oil. 